The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Based on Stroke Volume Variations Improves Fluid Management and Gastrointestinal Perfusion in Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the influence of stroke volume variation (SVV)-based goal-directed therapy (GDT) on splanchnic organ functions and postoperative complications in orthopedic patients. Subjects and Methods: Eighty patients scheduled for major orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to one of two equal groups to receive either intraoperative volume therapy guided by SVV (GDT) or standard fluid management (control). In the SVV group, patients received colloid boluses of 4 ml/kg to maintain an SVV <10% when in the supine position or an SVV <14% if prone. In the control group, fluids were given to maintain a mean arterial pressure >65 mm Hg, a heart rate <100 bpm, a central venous pressure of 8-14 mm Hg, and a urine output >0.5 ml/kg/h. Intraoperative organ perfusion, hemodynamic data, hospitalization, postoperative complications, and mortality were recorded. Results: The heart rate at the end of surgery was significantly lower (p < 0.05), there were fewer hypotensive episodes (p < 0.05), the arterial and gastric intramucosal pH were higher (p < 0.05 for both), the gastric intramucosal PCO 2 was lower (p < 0.05), the intraoperative infused colloids and the total infused volume were lower (p < 0.05 for both), and the postoperative time to flatus was shorter (p < 0.05) in the GDT group than in the control group. No differences in the length of hospital stay, complications, or mortality were found between the groups. Conclusion: SVV-based GDT during major orthopedic surgery reduced the volume of the required intraoperative infused fluids, maintained intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and improved the perioperative gastrointestinal function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Low, D. E., Allum, W., De Manzoni, G., Ferri, L., Immanuel, A., Kuppusamy, M., Law, S., Lindblad, M., Maynard, N., Neal, J., et al. (2019) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4 · Cited by 641
Malbrain, M. L. N. G., Van Regenmortel, N., Saugel, B., De Tavernier, B., Van Gaal, P.-J., Joannes-Boyau, O., Teboul, J.-L., Rice, T. W., Mythen, M., & Monnet, X. (2018) · Annals of Intensive Care · doi:10.1186/s13613-018-0402-x · Cited by 632
Antonelli, M., Levy, M., Andrews, P. J. D., Chastre, J., Hudson, L. D., Manthous, C., Meduri, G. U., Moreno, R. P., Putensen, C., Stewart, T., et al. (2007) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-007-0531-4 · Cited by 466
Marik, P. E., Linde-Zwirble, W. T., Bittner, E. A., Sahatjian, J., & Hansell, D. (2017) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4675-y · Cited by 362
Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients
Teboul, J.-L., Saugel, B., Cecconi, M., De Backer, D., Hofer, C. K., Monnet, X., Perel, A., Pinsky, M. R., Reuter, D. A., Rhodes, A., et al. (2016) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4375-7 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, K., Li, J., Cheng, H., & Ji, F.-H.
- Venue
- Medical Principles and Practice
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 413-420
- ISSN
- 1011-7571 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0151
- OpenAlex
- W2061045458
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 60.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Based on Stroke Volume Variations Improves Fluid Management and Gastrointestinal Perfusion in Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000363573
- The paper
- Peng, K., Li, J., Cheng, H., & Ji, F.-H. (2014). Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Based on Stroke Volume Variations Improves Fluid Management and Gastrointestinal Perfusion in Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery. Medical Principles and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1159/000363573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.