The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination: A New Assessment Tool for Dementia
Open accessAbstract
Background/Aims: We developed and validated the Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) in dementia patients. Comparisons were also made with the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Method: The M-ACE was developed using Mokken scaling analysis in 117 dementia patients [behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), n = 25; primary progressive aphasia (PPA), n = 49; Alzheimer's disease (AD), n = 34; corticobasal syndrome (CBS), n = 9] and validated in an independent sample of 164 dementia patients (bvFTD, n = 23; PPA, n = 82; AD, n = 38; CBS, n = 21) and 78 controls, who also completed the MMSE. Results: The M-ACE consists of 5 items with a maximum score of 30. Two cut-offs were identified: (1) ≤25/30 has both high sensitivity and specificity, and (2) ≤21/30 is almost certainly a score to have come from a dementia patient regardless of the clinical setting. The M-ACE is more sensitive than the MMSE and is less likely to have ceiling effects. Conclusion: The M-ACE is a brief and sensitive cognitive screening tool for dementia. Two cut-offs (25 or 21) are recommended. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x · Cited by 25,553
Hirono, N., Mori, E., Ikejiri, Y., Imamura, T., Shimomura, T., Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, H., & Ikeda, M. (1997) · Brain and nerve · Cited by 21,012
McKhann, G. M., Knopman, D. S., Chertkow, H., Hyman, B. T., Jack, C. R., Kawas, C. H., Klunk, W. E., Koroshetz, W. J., Manly, J. J., Mayeux, R., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 · Cited by 18,657
Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia
Rascovsky, K., Hodges, J. R., Knopman, D., Mendez, M. F., Kramer, J. H., Neuhaus, J., van Swieten, J. C., Seelaar, H., Dopper, E. G. P., Onyike, C. U., et al. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr179 · Cited by 5,221
Self-citationClassification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants
Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Hillis, A. E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S. F., Ogar, J. M., Rohrer, J. D., Black, S., Boeve, B. F., et al. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31821103e6 · Cited by 5,141
Self-citationAppelhof, B., Bakker, C., Van Duinen-van den Ijssel, J. C. L., Zwijsen, S. A., Smalbrugge, M., Verhey, F. R. J., de Vugt, M. E., Zuidema, S. U., & Koopmans, R. T. C. M. (2017) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000477087 · Cited by 2,760
Qualitative Assessment of Verbal Fluency Performance in Frontotemporal Dementia
van den Berg, E., Jiskoot, L. C., Grosveld, M. J. H., van Swieten, J. C., & Papma, J. M. (2017) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000477538 · Cited by 2,046
Mioshi, E., Dawson, K., Mitchell, J., Arnold, R., & Hodges, J. R. (2006) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.1610 · Cited by 2,016
Self-citationHsieh, S., Schubert, S., Hoon, C., Mioshi, E., & Hodges, J. R. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000351671 · Cited by 973
Self-citationIntroduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory
Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. (2002) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412984676 · Cited by 761
Cited by
Reliability and validity of the UK Biobank cognitive tests
Fawns-Ritchie, C., & Deary, I. J. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231627 · Cited by 396
Ducharme, S., Dols, A., Laforce, R., Devenney, E., Kumfor, F., van den Stock, J., Dallaire-Théroux, C., Seelaar, H., Gossink, F., Vijverberg, E., et al. (2020) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa018 · Cited by 320
Self-citationDe Roeck, E. E., De Deyn, P. P., Dierckx, E., & Engelborghs, S. (2019) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-019-0474-3 · Cited by 209
O’Connor (2017) · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000004215 · Cited by 60
Zarit Burden Interview: pragmatic study in a dedicated cognitive function clinic
Stagg, B., & Larner, A. J. (2015) · Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/pnp.390 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsieh, S., McGrory, S., Leslie, F., Dawson, K., Ahmed, S., Butler, C. R., Rowe, J. B., Mioshi, E., & Hodges, J. R.
- Venue
- Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2014-09-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9824
- OpenAlex
- W2003950361
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 8.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Licence
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (vor)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination: A New Assessment Tool for Dementia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000366040
- The paper
- Hsieh, S., McGrory, S., Leslie, F., Dawson, K., Ahmed, S., Butler, C. R., Rowe, J. B., Mioshi, E., & Hodges, J. R. (2015). The Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination: A New Assessment Tool for Dementia. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1159/000366040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
