Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 531

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heart Rate Assessment Immediately after Birth

Phillipos, Emily, Solevåg, Anne Lee, Pichler, Gerhard, Aziz, Khalid, van Os, Sylvia, O''Reilly, Megan, Cheung, Po-Yin, Schmölzer, Georg M.·2016·Neonatology

Abstract

Background: Heart rate assessment immediately after birth in newborn infants is critical to the correct guidance of resuscitation efforts. There are disagreements as to the best method to measure heart rate. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess different methods of heart rate assessment in newborn infants at birth to determine the fastest and most accurate method. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar were systematically searched using the following terms: ‘infant', ‘heart rate', ‘monitoring', ‘delivery room', ‘resuscitation', ‘stethoscope', ‘auscultation', ‘palpation', ‘pulse oximetry', ‘electrocardiogram', ‘Doppler ultrasound', ‘photoplethysmography' and ‘wearable sensors'. Results: Eighteen studies were identified that described various methods of heart rate assessment in newborn infants immediately after birth. Studies examining auscultation, palpation, pulse oximetry, electrocardiography and Doppler ultrasound as ways to measure heart rate were included. Heart rate measurements by pulse oximetry are superior to auscultation and palpation, but there is contradictory evidence about its accuracy depending on whether the sensor is connected to the infant or the oximeter first. Several studies indicate that electrocardiogram provides a reliable heart rate faster than pulse oximetry. Doppler ultrasound shows potential for clinical use, however future evidence is needed to support this conclusion. Conclusion: Heart rate assessment is important and there are many measurement methods. The accuracy of routinely applied methods varies, with palpation and auscultation being the least accurate and electrocardiogram being the most accurate. More research is needed on Doppler ultrasound before its clinical use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000441940

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 531

Metadata

Authors
Phillipos, E., Solevåg, A. L., Pichler, G., Aziz, K., van Os, S., O''Reilly, M., Cheung, P.-Y., & Schmölzer, G. M.
Venue
Neonatology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2015-12-19
Volume
109
Issue
2
Pages
130-138
ISSN
  • 1661-7800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1661-7819
OpenAlex
W2199185488
Cited by
531
References
24
FWCI
28.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heart Rate Assessment Immediately after Birth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000441940
The paper
Phillipos, E., Solevåg, A. L., Pichler, G., Aziz, K., van Os, S., O''Reilly, M., Cheung, P.-Y., & Schmölzer, G. M. (2016). Heart Rate Assessment Immediately after Birth. Neonatology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441940

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.