The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biochemistry and Biology of Anaphylatoxins
Abstract
The molecular architecture of anaphylatoxins has been explored on several levels. Primary, secondary and tertiary structural parameters that dictate function of the C3a, C4a and C5a molecules are being elucidated with the aid of comparative sequence analyses, physical measurements and organic syntheses. Although C3a, C4a and C5a are biologically distinct mediators, as defined by their unique receptor systems, a common genetic origin is apparent from conserved features in their primary structures. Evidence is now available which suggests that similarities in the folding pattern of the anaphylatoxins may dictate a concensus conformation for each factor. We have learned from synthetic peptide studies that the binding (e.g. effector) site in anaphylatoxin molecules exists as a linear sequence contained in the C-terminal portion of the polypeptide. What is also evident is that a preferred conformation is defined for the binding site requiring a proper side chain orientation for optimal bioactivity. It is proposed that folding of the native structure stabilizes this conformation at the binding site. The binding site in C3a contains the essential residues LGLAR folded in an irregular or pseudo-beta-turn and stabilized by an adjacent alpha-helical segment. It is proposed that the alpha-helical segment influences orientation of the side chain residues in the 'binding site'. A similar model is evolving for C5a based on synthetic C5a peptides that express both spasmogenic and chemotactic activities. This helix turn model promises to be representative of an essential structural feature that determines anaphylatoxin activity. We believe that these models contribute significantly to our understanding of the molecular relationships between structure and function for these humoral mediators of inflammation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of complement in inflammation and phagocytosis
Frank, M. M., & Fries, L. F. (1991) · Immunology Today · doi:10.1016/0167-5699(91)90009-i · Cited by 503
Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology of Pneumococcal Meningitis
Mook-Kanamori, B. B., Geldhoff, M., van der Poll, T., & van de Beek, D. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00008-11 · Cited by 492
THE ROLE OF THE COMPLEMENT SYSTEM IN ISCHEMIA-REPERFUSION INJURY
Arumugam, T. V., Shiels, I. A., Woodruff, T. M., Granger, D. N., & Taylor, S. M. (2004) · Shock · doi:10.1097/00024382-200405000-00002 · Cited by 327
The complement system: History, pathways, cascade and inhibitors
Nesargikar, P., Spiller, B., & Chavez, R. (2012) · European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1556/eujmi.2.2012.2.2 · Cited by 324
Membrane attack by complement: the assembly and biology of terminal complement complexes
Tegla, C. A., Cudrici, C., Patel, S., Trippe, R., Rus, V., Niculescu, F., & Rus, H. (2011) · Immunologic Research · doi:10.1007/s12026-011-8239-5 · Cited by 321
Metadata
- Authors
- Hugli, T. E.
- Venue
- Complement
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 111-127
- ISSN
- 0253-5076 (ISSN-L)
- 2504-2424
- OpenAlex
- W71208058
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biochemistry and Biology of Anaphylatoxins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000467889
- The paper
- Hugli, T. E. (1986). Biochemistry and Biology of Anaphylatoxins. Complement. https://doi.org/10.1159/000467889
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.