The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Unintended Return of Consciousness in a Patient during Surgery and General Anesthesia
Abstract
Awareness is an uncommon complication of anaesthesia, affecting 0.1-0.2% of all surgical patients. Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring measures the depth of anaesthesia and facilitates anaesthetic titration. In this trial we determined whether BIS-guided anaesthesia reduced the incidence of awareness during surgery in adults.We did a prospective, randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial. Adult patients at high risk of awareness were randomly allocated to BIS-guided anaesthesia or routine care. Patients were assessed by a blinded observer for awareness at 2-6 h, 24-36 h, and 30 days after surgery. An independent committee, blinded to group identity, assessed every report of awareness. The primary outcome measure was confirmed awareness under anaesthesia at any time.Of 2463 eligible and consenting patients, 1225 were assigned to the BIS group and 1238 to the routine care group. There were two reports of awareness in the BIS-guided group and 11 reports in the routine care group (p=0.022). BIS-guided anaesthesia reduced the risk of awareness by 82% (95% CI 17-98%).BIS-guided anaesthesia reduces the risk of awareness in at-risk adult surgical patients undergoing relaxant general anaesthesia. With a cost of routine BIS monitoring at US16 dollars per use in Australia and a number needed to treat of 138, the cost of preventing one case of awareness in high-risk patients is about 2200 dollars.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery
Lundberg, S. M., Nair, B., Vavilala, M. S., Horibe, M., Eisses, M. J., Adams, T., Liston, D. E., Low, D. K.-W., Newman, S.-F., Kim, J., et al. (2018) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-018-0304-0 · Cited by 1,967
Alkire, M. T., Hudetz, A. G., & Tononi, G. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1149213 · Cited by 1,245
Clinical Electroencephalography for Anesthesiologists: Part I: Background and Basic Signatures
Purdon, P. L., Sampson, A., Pavone, K. J., & Brown, E. N. (2015) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000000841 · Cited by 854
Boly, M., Massimini, M., Tsuchiya, N., Postle, B. R., Koch, C., & Tononi, G. (2017) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3218-16.2017 · Cited by 557
Mushambi, M. C., Kinsella, S. M., Popat, M., Swales, H., Ramaswamy, K. K., Winton, A. L., & Quinn, A. C. (2015) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.13260 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, W., Dąbrowski, S., Gutysz-Wojnicka, A., Ozga, D., & Wojtaszek, M.
- Venue
- European Neurology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 262-266
- ISSN
- 0014-3022 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9913
- OpenAlex
- W2597614655
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unintended Return of Consciousness in a Patient during Surgery and General Anesthesia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000471510
- The paper
- Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, W., Dąbrowski, S., Gutysz-Wojnicka, A., Ozga, D., & Wojtaszek, M. (2017). Unintended Return of Consciousness in a Patient during Surgery and General Anesthesia. European Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000471510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.