The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
STW 5 (Iberogast) Therapy in Gastrointestinal Functional Disorders
Abstract
Background: Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are very common and affect populations worldwide. A majority of patients are affected by a variety of heterogenous gastrointestinal symptoms (GIS) related to the upper and lower digestive system with frequent overlap and mostly of mild to moderate degree. The herbal medicinal preparation STW 5 is documented as an effective therapeutic option for treating FGID. Studies Conducted in Summary: STW 5 has been in use for more than 50 years in clinical practice and proven to be effective and safe in the management of FGID. The high efficacy of STW 5 on symptoms clustered in functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) as well as on individual abdominal symptoms is demonstrated in 5 controlled, randomized double-blind studies in FD and in one trial conducted in patients with IBS. In addition the beneficial therapeutic effect of STW 5 on FGD as well as safety issues have been reported in a series of non interventional studies conducted in several thousands of adult patients and including 980 children. An additional study has been performed addressing the question as to how quickly the therapeutic effect is obtained after STW 5 administration. Key Messages from These Studies: STW 5 is an effective phyto-medication for treating patients with FD and IBS. STW 5 acts beneficially on abdominal symptom clusters as well as on individual GIS in adults and children. The time to onset of action is rapid, well tolerated and safe. The repetitive use of STW 5 is an appropriate option in clinical practice for patients with FGID.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Iberogast (STW 5), which combines multiple herbs, has demonstrated benefits in large observational and clinical studies, suggesting its effectiveness as complementary or integrative treatment for symptom relief in IBS patients [112].”
From Natural Remedies for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of Herbal-Based Therapies (2025) · cites this paper as [112]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-analysis
Lovell, R. M., & Ford, A. C. (2012) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.02.029 · Cited by 2,155
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i4.564 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-2002-32130 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01183.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01249.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01142.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0016-5085(11)60415-0 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01859.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10354-017-0578-y · DOI
- 10.1007/s10354-012-0169-x · DOI
- 10.1055/s-2001-18536 · DOI
Cited by
Natural Remedies for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of Herbal-Based Therapies
Abalo, R., Gallego-Barceló, P., & Gabbia, D. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26199345 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Malfertheiner, P.
- ORCID
- Malfertheiner, Peter
- Venue
- Digestive Diseases
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- Suppl. 1
- Pages
- 25-29
- ISSN
- 0257-2753
- 1421-9875
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (vor)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.