Cited by 61Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchOccupational and environmental lung diseases

Metformin does not affect clinically relevant outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Open access
Spagnolo, Paolo, Kreuter, Michael, Maher, Toby M., Wuyts, Wim, Bonella, Francesco, Corte, Tamera J., Kopf, Stefan, Weycker, Derek +2 more·2018·Respiration

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a possible risk factor for the development of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), yet the effect of antidiabetic therapy on the course of IPF is unknown. Objectives: This post hoc analysis assessed the effect of metformin on clinically relevant outcomes in patients with IPF. Methods: For the primary analysis, patients randomized to placebo (n = 624) in 3 phase 3, double-blind, controlled trials of pirfenidone (CAPACITY [NCT00287716 and NCT00287729]; ASCEND [NCT01366209]) were categorized by baseline metformin use. The primary outcome was disease progression (forced vital capacity [FVC] decline ≥10%, 6-min walking distance [6MWD] decline ≥50 m, or death). Other outcomes included mortality, hospitalization, FVC decline (≥10 and ≥5%), and 6MWD decline. Outcomes were also assessed in patients with diabetes and/or hyperglycemia (impaired glucose tolerance [IGT] and diabetes population [IGT-diabetes population]) and all patients included in the 3 studies (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Results: Overall, 71 (11.4%) patients were metformin users and 553 (88.6%) were nonmetformin users. Baseline data were similar between groups, except for a higher percentage of males (84.5 vs. 73.2%) and a history of diabetes (98.6 vs. 11.6%) in metformin users versus nonmetformin users. The unadjusted 1-year analyses demonstrated no significant differences in disease progression or other outcomes. A higher proportion of metformin users compared with nonmetformin users had a relative FVC decline of ≥5% (63.4 vs. 50.6%, p = 0.043). Results were similar for the IGT-diabetes population and for the ITT population. Multivariable analyses yielded similar results. Conclusions: Metformin has no effect on clinically relevant outcomes in patients with IPF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000489668

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Post-hoc analysis of metformin versus non-metformin in the placebo arms of three IPF trials revealed that metformin had no significant effect on disease progression, lung function decline, and mortality in IPF.

    “a post-hoc analysis of metformin versus non-metformin in the placebo arms of three IPF trials revealed that metformin had no significant effect on disease progression, lung function decline, and mortality in IPF (Spagnolo et al., 2018).”

    From Pulmonary fibrosis: Emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies (2023) · cites this paper as Spagnolo et al., 2018

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spagnolo, P., Kreuter, M., Maher, T. M., Wuyts, W., Bonella, F., Corte, T. J., Kopf, S., Weycker, D., Kirchgaessler, K.-U., & Ryerson, C. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Royal Brompton Hospital (GB)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • Ruhrlandklinik (DE)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • Policy Analysis (United States) (US)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Respiration
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2018
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
314-322
ISSN
  • 0025-7931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0356
OpenAlex
W2884114811
Cited by
61
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3
FWCI
5.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Respiration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CS-2013-13-017)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Occupational and environmental lung diseases
Keywords
metformin, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, pirfenidone, antidiabetic therapy, disease progression, forced vital capacity decline, 6-minute walk distance, mortality, hospitalization, diabetes mellitus, impaired glucose tolerance, hyperglycemia
MeSH terms
Aged, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Pyridones, Vital Capacity, Disease Progression, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review