Cited by 13Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Decreased Occupational Functioning and Increased Physical Health Complaints in Treatment Seekers with Internet-Related Disorders: Compared to Patients with Gambling Disorder

Müller, Kai W., Beutel, Manfred E., Wölfling, Klaus·2019·European Addiction Research

Abstract

Background: Internet-related disorders (IRDs) as a growing mental health issue will probably be included in the upcoming ICD-11. While research on psychological aspects has progressed, less data are available regarding the physical health status of patients. Thus, we provide new data on physical health complaints, prediagnosed illness, level of functioning, and work ability in a clinical sample. Methods: From consecutive treatment seekers, we included n = 286 patients with IRD, n = 95 subjects with excessive yet not disordered Internet use, and n = 106 patients with gambling disorder (GD). All 3 groups were compared regarding lifestyle habits, medical history, somatic complaints, sleep disturbances, level of functioning and work ability using standardized self-reports, and clinical ratings. Results: Patients with IRD differed from nonclinical controls by higher somatic complaints, a lower level of functioning, and a higher degree of impairment in social and occupational contexts. Only few differences were found between patients with IRD and GD. Conclusions: Compared to individuals with excessive, not addictive online behaviors, patients diagnosed with IRD displayed higher somatic symptoms, and more sleep problems. This implies that psychotherapeutic interventions should also consider physical and psychosomatic problems when treating patients. Among patients with IRD, significant social and occupational deficits were comparable to patients with GD. This emphasizes that IRD are causing severe impairment in relevant aspects of the patients’ lives.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000500543

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Müller, K. W., Beutel, M. E., & Wölfling, K.
Affiliations
University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Venue
European Addiction Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2019
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
229-237
ISSN
  • 1022-6877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9891
OpenAlex
W2958755792
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Addiction Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
gambling addiction, occupational functioning, work ability, physical health complaints, somatic symptoms, sleep disorders, excessive internet use, psychosomatic disorders, social dysfunction, ICD-11
MeSH terms
Help-Seeking Behavior, Adolescent, Adult, Employment, Gambling, Health Status, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Behavior, Addictive, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review