Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 614

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Terminology of Dental Caries and Dental Caries Management: Consensus Report of a Workshop Organized by ORCA and Cariology Research Group of IADR

Open access
Machiulskiene, Vita, Campus, Guglielmo, Carvalho, Joana Christina, Dige, Irene, Ekstrand, Kim Rud, Jablonski-Momeni, Anahita, Maltz, Marisa, Manton, David J., Martignon, Stefania, Martinez-Mier, E. Angeles, Pitts, Nigel B., Schulte, Andreas G., Splieth, Christian H., Tenuta, Livia Maria Andaló, Ferreira Zandona, Andrea, Nyvad, Bente·2020·Caries Research

Abstract

A 2-day workshop of ORCA and the IADR Cariology Research Group was organized to discuss and reach consensus on definitions of the most commonly used terms in cariology. The aims were to identify and to select the most commonly used terms of dental caries and dental caries management and to define them based on current concepts. Terms related to definition, diagnosis, risk assessment, and monitoring of dental caries were included. The Delphi process was used to establish terms to be considered using the nominal group method favored by consensus. Of 222 terms originally suggested by six cariologists from different countries, a total of 59 terms were reviewed after removing duplicates and unnecessary words. Sixteen experts in cariology took part in the process of reaching consensus about the definitions of the selected caries terms. Decisions were made following thorough “round table” discussions of each term and confirmed by secret electronic voting. Full agreement (100%) was reached on 17 terms, while the definitions of 6 terms were below the agreed 80% threshold of consensus. The suggested terminology is recommended for use in research, in public health, as well as in clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000503309

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 614

Metadata

Authors
Machiulskiene, V., Campus, G., Carvalho, J. C., Dige, I., Ekstrand, K. R., Jablonski-Momeni, A., Maltz, M., Manton, D. J., Martignon, S., Martinez-Mier, E. A., Pitts, N. B., Schulte, A. G., Splieth, C. H., Tenuta, L. M. A., Ferreira Zandona, A., & Nyvad, B.
Venue
Caries Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2019-10-07
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
7-14
ISSN
  • 0008-6568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-976X
OpenAlex
W2979928382
Cited by
614
References
29
FWCI
46.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Terminology of Dental Caries and Dental Caries Management: Consensus Report of a Workshop Organized by ORCA and Cariology Research Group of IADR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000503309
The paper
Machiulskiene, V., Campus, G., Carvalho, J. C., Dige, I., Ekstrand, K. R., Jablonski-Momeni, A., Maltz, M., Manton, D. J., Martignon, S., Martinez-Mier, E. A., Pitts, N. B., Schulte, A. G., Splieth, C. H., Tenuta, L. M. A., Ferreira Zandona, A., & Nyvad, B. (2020). Terminology of Dental Caries and Dental Caries Management: Consensus Report of a Workshop Organized by ORCA and Cariology Research Group of IADR. Caries Research. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503309

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.