Improving Children’s Diet: Approach and Progress
Abstract
We highlight key findings from a recent comprehensive review of social and behavior change communication (SBCC) interventions to improve complementary feeding in low-middle-income countries and discuss 4 large-scale programs as illustrative case studies. Improving dietary diversity was the most commonly targeted practice, and interpersonal communication was the most commonly used platform for the 64 interventions included in the comprehensive review. The number of behavior change techniques used by any one intervention ranged from 2 to 13 (median 6); all provided instruction on how to perform the target behavior(s), followed by the use of a "credible" source to provide the SBCC (n = 46), demonstration of the behavior (n = 35) and providing information about health consequences of the behavior (n = 35). The key factors that contributed to the success of the large-scale programs applying SBCC alone, or in combination with point-of-use fortification or nutrition-sensitive agriculture, included the formation of alliances with key stakeholders, availability of funds, technical support from multiple donors, well-defined theory of change, and streamlined processes for monitoring and implementation. Major limitations included a lack of detailed information on (a) intervention design, (b) behavioral theories or frameworks, (c) implementation processes including adaptations to context, and (d) cost and feasibility.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Addressing two health behaviors simultaneously with a multidisciplinary approach may have an indirect or synergistic impact.
“In this regard, current research shows that addressing two health behaviors simultaneously with a multidisciplinary approach may have an indirect or synergistic impact [14,45,48].”
From A Systematic Review of School-Based Nutrition Interventions for Promoting Healthy Dietary Practices and Lifestyle Among School Children and Adolescents (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 4
- Authors
- Ramakrishnan, U., & Webb Girard, A.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- ORCID
- Ramakrishnan, Usha
- Venue
- Nestlé Nutrition Institute Workshop Series
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 93
- Pages
- 25-38
- ISSN
- 1664-2147 (ISSN-L)
- 1664-2155
- OpenAlex
- W3003628606
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nestlé Nutrition Institute Workshop series (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Keywords
- complementary feeding, child nutrition, social and behavior change communication, dietary diversity, behaviour change techniques, interpersonal communication, nutrition-sensitive agriculture, stakeholder collaboration, theory of change, low- and middle-income countries
- MeSH terms
- Diet, Healthy, Sustainable Development, Asia, Southeastern, Behavior Therapy, Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Child, Preschool, Diet, Feeding Methods, Food, Fortified, Health Education, Humans, Infant, Infant Nutrition Disorders, Child Nutrition Disorders, Africa South of the Sahara, Micronutrients
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review