Cited by 4Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesBody Contouring and SurgeryMinimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Visual Analysis of Biomarkers Reveals Differences in Lipid Profiles and Liver Enzymes before and after Gastric Sleeve and Bypass

Open access

Abstract

Introduction: Bariatric surgery results in both intentional and unintentional metabolic changes. In a high-volume bariatric center, extensive laboratory panels are used to monitor these changes pre- and postoperatively. Consecutive measurements of relevant biochemical markers allow exploration of the health state of bariatric patients and comparison of different patient groups. Objective: The objective of this study is to compare biomarker distributions over time between 2 common bariatric procedures, i.e., sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (RYGB), using visual analytics. Methods: Both pre- and postsurgical (6, 12, and 24 months) data of all patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery were collected retrospectively. The distribution and evolution of different biochemical markers were compared before and after surgery using asymmetric beanplots in order to evaluate the effect of primary SG and RYGB. A beanplot is an alternative to the boxplot that allows an easy and thorough visual comparison of univariate data. Results: In total, 1,237 patients (659 SG and 578 RYGB) were included. The sleeve and bypass groups were comparable in terms of age and the prevalence of comorbidities. The mean presurgical BMI and the percentage of males were higher in the sleeve group. The effect of surgery on lowering of glycated hemoglobin was similar for both surgery types. After RYGB surgery, the decrease in the cholesterol concentration was larger than after SG. The enzymatic activity of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphate in sleeve patients was higher presurgically but lower postsurgically compared to bypass values. Conclusions: Beanplots allow intuitive visualization of population distributions. Analysis of this large population-based data set using beanplots suggests comparable efficacies of both types of surgery in reducing diabetes. RYGB surgery reduced dyslipidemia more effectively than SG. The trend toward a larger decrease in liver enzyme activities following SG is a subject for further investigation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000510401

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.7326/0003-4819-142-7-200504050-00013 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/01.sla.0000137343.63376.19 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1056/NEJMoa066254 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.soard.2016.12.018 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.soard.2012.12.010 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s11695-013-1079-8 · DOI
  8. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826e1846 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.soard.2013.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.18637/jss.v028.c01 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/978-3-319-00032-9_14 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.soard.2015.02.003 · DOI
  13. 10.1056/NEJMoa1600869 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1001/archsurg.2010.326 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s00125-013-2965-2 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s11695-012-0827-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s11695-015-1891-4 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s11695-015-1825-1 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s11695-012-0662-8 · DOI
  20. 10.2337/dc12-1737 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.metabol.2009.10.004 · DOI
  22. 10.1371/journal.pone.0060495 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s11695-016-2482-8 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s11695-018-3537-9 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s11695-015-2006-y · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s11695-015-1691-x · DOI
  27. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002397 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/ajcn/84.2.304 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s00125-008-1116-7 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.05.046 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/hep.24341 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1055/s-0028-1091985 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/oby.20548 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s11695-019-04119-5 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s11695-020-04488-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
van Berckel, M. M. G., van Loon, S. L. M., Boer, A.-K., Scharnhorst, V., & Nienhuijs, S. W.
Affiliations
Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL)
Venue
Obesity Facts
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2021
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
21-31
ISSN
  • 1662-4025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1662-4033
OpenAlex
W3127417320
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Facts (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Keywords
bariatric surgery, sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, lipid profile, liver enzymes, dyslipidemia, HbA1c, diabetes mellitus, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, cholesterol, biomarkers, visual analytics
MeSH terms
Adult, Alanine Transaminase, Aspartate Aminotransferases, Female, Gastrectomy, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Lipids, Liver, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Postoperative Period, Retrospective Studies, Gastric Bypass, Biomarkers, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review