Cited by 6Urticaria and Related ConditionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Imaging in Medicine

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Smartphone Photographs of Chronic Urticaria Taken by Patients Are of Good Quality and Useful in the Clinic

Open access

Abstract

Background: Chronic urticaria (CU) is characterized by transient wheals and angioedema, which are often not present when patients see their treating physician. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of smartphone photographs captured by patients prior to their first visit at an urticaria outpatient clinic. Methods: A survey regarding the quality and utility of smartphone photographs of urticarial skin lesions in patients with CU attending the outpatient clinic for the first time was conducted. Up to three random patient-selected photographs of skin lesions were evaluated by a physician. Results: Of 148 patients, 118 (79.7%) had taken photographs of their skin lesions prior to the consultation, and 75% took photographs with the intention of presenting it to their physician. The photographs were of wheals in 90% of the cases and angioedema in 8%. In total, 72% of the smartphone photographs had the skin lesion in focus, 64% had good resolution, and 48% had good lighting. Only 9% of the smartphone photographs were blurred, 10% had bad lighting, 4% had bad resolution, and 8% did not have the lesion in focus. Moreover, 86% of the smartphone photographs were found to be useful for clinical evaluation. At least one photograph of good/very good quality was presented by 86% of the patients, and 97% had at least one photograph that was useful for clinical evaluation. Conclusion: Patients with CU often take smartphone photographs of their skin lesions on their own initiative prior to their first consultation to present the photographs to their physician. These smartphone photographs are very often of good quality and suitable for clinical evaluation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000535027

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 1 Zuberbier T, Abdul Latiff AH, Abuzakouk M, Aquilina S, Asero R, Baker D, et al. The international EAACI/GA 2 LEN/EuroGuiDerm/ APAAACI guideline for the de fi nition, classi fi cation, diagnosis, and management of urticaria. Allergy. 2022;77(3):734 -66.
  2. 2 Abbott LM, Magnusson RS, Gibbs E, Smith SD. Smartphone use in dermatology for clinical photography and consultation: current practice and the law. Australas J Dermatol. 2018;59(2):101 -7.
  3. 3 Marin-Gomez FX, Vidal-Alaball J, Poch PR, Sariola CJ, Ferrer RT, Peña JM. Diagnosis of skin lesions using photographs taken with a mobile phone: an online survey of primary care physicians. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11:2150132720937831.
  4. 4 Ouellette S, Rao BK. Usefulness of smartphones in dermatology: a US-based Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6): 3553.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ali, Z., Sørensen, J. A., Zhang, D. G., Ghazanfar, M. N., Allerup, J. A. C., Maurer, M., Kocatürk, E., Vestergaard, C., & Thomsen, S. F.
Affiliations
  • Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Koç University (TR)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Dermatology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2023-11-04
Volume
240
Issue
3
Pages
357-361
ISSN
  • 1018-8665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9832
OpenAlex
W4388406323
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dermatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Urticaria and Related Conditions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Digital Imaging in Medicine
Keywords
chronic urticaria, wheals, angioedema, image quality, clinical evaluation, patient self-report
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Chronic Urticaria, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photography, Urticaria, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review