Cited by 53Educational Methods and OutcomesCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceSTEM Education

The Influence Process of Science Skill and Motivation Learning with Creativity Learn

Open access
Bhakti, Yoga Budi, Dwi Astuti, Irnin Agustina·2018·Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)

Abstract

This research aims to understand the influence process of science skill and motivation learning with creativity learn. Data about the process of scince skill, motivation and creativity learn collected by test questioner instrument. Data analysis with regression analysis and correlation. Research shows that: There is the influence of skill process of science to the process of creativity learn with correlation coefficient r=0.634, there is the influence of motivation learn students to creativity learning with correlation coefficient r=0.55, the process of science skills and motivation to study for students influence of creativity learn with correlation coefficient r=0.935. This study concluded that skill process of science and the motivation to study student could creative learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11591/edulearn.v12i1.6912

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At the elementary school level, creativity is a driving force for learning motivation.

    “At the elementary school level, creativity is a driving force for learning motivation (Bhakti & Astuti, 2018).”

    From Show and Tell Learning Method Based on the Discovery Learning Model: Creativity and Learning Outcomes at Primary School (2025) · cites this paper as Bhakti & Astuti, 2018

    The Results and Analysis section describes the direction the other way around: students’ learning motivation contributes to learning creativity, and higher motivation is associated with higher creativity. The paper calls motivation—not creativity—the driving force behind learning activities. The supplied passages do not give page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Brum & McKane. 1989. Study Guide Biology: Exploring Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Hibbard, K.M. t.t. Performance Assessment in The Science Classroom. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
  3. Zeidan, Afif Hafez & Majdi Rashed Jayosi. 2015. Science Process Skills and Attitudes toward Science among Palestinian Secondary School Students. World Journal of Education Vol. 5, No. 1.
  4. Samsudin, Mohd Ali, Noor Hasyimah Haniza, Corrienna Abdul-Talib, Hayani Marlia Mhd Ibrahim. 2015. The Relationship between Multiple Intelligences with Preferred Science Teaching and Science Process Skills. Journal of Education and Learning. Vol. 9(1) pp. 53-59.
  5. Bryce, T.G.K., McCall, J., MacGregor, J., Robertson, I.J. & Weston, R.A.J. 1990. Techniques for Assessing Process Skills in Practical Science: Teacher's guide. Oxford: Heinemann Educational Books.
  6. Bakar, Ramli. 2014. The Effect of Learning Motivation on Student's Productive Competencies in Vocational High School, West Sumatra. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 2014, 4(6): 722-732.
  7. Diki. 2013. "Creativity for Learning Biology in Higher Education," LUX: A Journal of Transdisciplinary Writing and Research from Claremont Graduate University: Vol. 3: Iss. 1, Article 3.
  8. Hadzigeorgiou, Yannis, Persa Fokialis, and Mary Kabouropoulou. 2012. Thinking about Creativity in Science Education. Journal of Scientifict Research Publishing Vol.3, No.5, 603-611
  9. Karamustafaoğlu, Sevilay. 2011. Improving the Science Process Skills Ability of Science Student Teachers Using I Diagrams. Eurasian J. Phys. Chem. Educ. 3(1):26-38.
  10. Kelly, G. J., Brown, C., & Crawford, T. 2000. Experiments, contingencies, and curriculum: Providing opportunities for learning through improvisation in science teaching. Science Education. 84(5): 624-657.
  11. BIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS My name is Yoga Budi Bhakti. I live in Jatimulya, Bekasi, West Java. I'm graduated bachelor degree from Physics Education at Jakarta State of University. Also master degree of Research and Evaluation of Education at Jakarta State of University. I'm lecturer in Indraprasta PGRI of University. I'm teaching about Based of Physics, Statistic, and Evaluation. My name is Irnin Agustina Dwi Astuti. I'm from Bekasi, West Java. I'm lecturer in University of Indraprasta PGRI since 2015 until now. My teaching skill in the field of learning media and physics education. My hobbies are writing journal and research in learninng media and physics education. I'm graduated bachelor degree from Physics Education at Ahmad Dahlan University, and master degree of Physics Education at Ahmad Dahlan University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhakti, Y. B., & Dwi Astuti, I. A.
Affiliations
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI (ID)
Venue
Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)
Published
2018-01-02
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
30-35
ISSN
  • 2089-9823 (ISSN-L)
  • 2302-9277
OpenAlex
W2782065238
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7
FWCI
17.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Optimum: Journal of Economics and Development (University of Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Education › STEM Education
Keywords
science skills, student motivation, creativity, creative learning, student creativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review