Cited by 2Pancasila Values in EducationEducational Curriculum and Learning MethodsEducational Methods and Outcomes

Show and Tell Learning Method Based on the Discovery Learning Model: Creativity and Learning Outcomes at Primary School

Open access
Nur, Zahra, Mulyadi, Mulyadi, Nurdiansyah, Erwin·2025·ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review

Abstract

Conventional and boring learning paradigms typically lead to low creativity and learning outcomes in Pancasila and Citizenship Education. Researchers at Primary School 126 Inpres Kariango, Maros Regency, found a new way to attract kids interested in civics. This study examines how the Discovery Learning-based Show and Tell learning technique influences fifth-grade students' creativity and learning at Primary School 126 Inpres Kariango. This research is an experimental quantitative study. The study included 30 fifth graders. Pretests and posttests measured learning outcomes, and observation sheets measured student inventiveness. To assess intervention efficacy, descriptive and inferential statistics were used, including normality, homogeneity, and t-tests. The findings found considerable improvements in all areas: (1) Teacher instruction improved from "Very Poor" (35%) to "Good" (70%). (2) Student participation skyrocketed to "Very Good" (90%) at the final meeting. (3) Students' creativity scores increased from 49.00 (less creative) to 83.67 (creative/very creative). (4) Average student learning outcomes rose from 52.57 to 82.47, with 93.4% reaching moderate to very high. The hypothesis test shows that this strategy boosts creativity and learning. In conclusion, the Discovery Learning-based Show and Tell method enhances student learning in the PPKn subject, fosters creativity, and enhances interaction. This study helps teachers apply student-centered learning practices. This study strengthens our knowledge of how communicative strategies and discovery models improve primary school critical and creative thinking.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The study reports that integrating Show and Tell into Discovery Learning improved fifth-grade students’ creativity and PPKn learning outcomes at one primary school. It uses a one-group pretest-posttest design with 30 analyzed students and reports large gains, though some hypothesis-test results and sample counts are inconsistent.

Key findings

  • Teacher activity improved from “Very Poor” (35%) to “Good” (70%), while student activity reached 90% (“Excellent”/“Very Good”) at the final meeting.
  • Creativity rose from a pretest mean of 49.00 (“less creative”) to a posttest mean of 83.67; posttest categories were 40% “Very Creative,” 40% “Creative,” and 20% “Quite Creative,” with no students in the less/very less creative categories.
  • Learning outcomes rose from a pretest mean of 52.57 to a posttest mean of 82.47; posttest categories were 6.6% low, 30% moderate, 33.4% high, and 30% very high, with the abstract reporting 93.4% reaching moderate to very high.
  • For creativity, the posttest regression coefficient was 0.298 (t = 2.348; significance 0.026 in the table, 0.028 in the text), described as significant; for learning outcomes, the posttest coefficient was 0.401 with significance 0.109, described as not significant, despite the conclusion claiming significant influence.

Methods

  • Quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design with no control group. Population was 403 students at Primary School 126 Inpres Kariango; the abstract says 30 fifth graders, the method says all 33 fifth-grade students, and analyses use N = 30. Sampling was nonprobability saturated/census sampling.
  • Instruments were an objective learning outcome test and a creativity observation sheet using a Likert scale across four indicators: fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. The study had three stages: pretest, treatment using Discovery Learning syntax (stimulation, problem identification, data collection, data processing, proving, drawing conclusions) with Show and Tell at the proof/verification stage, and posttest.
  • Analysis used descriptive statistics, normality tests (Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk), homogeneity tests, and hypothesis testing in SPSS. The method section says a paired sample t-test was used, but the results report regression coefficients.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: there was no control group for comparison, and the authors suggest future research on other materials or subjects with wider sample coverage.
  • Evident from the text: the sample size is reported inconsistently (33 fifth-grade students in the method vs. N = 30 in the analyses), and some category percentages are inconsistent (e.g., posttest creativity text says 12 students (20%) for creative and very creative, while the table says 12 (40%) each).
  • Evident from the text: hypothesis-testing reporting is inconsistent—the method says paired sample t-test, but results use regression; the learning outcome hypothesis is reported as not significant (sig. 0.109), yet the conclusion states the posttest variable significantly influenced learning outcomes.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.51574/ijrer.v5i1.4350

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

14 of 25 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    At the elementary school level, creativity is a driving force for learning motivation.

    “At the elementary school level, creativity is a driving force for learning motivation (Bhakti & Astuti, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bhakti & Astuti, 2018 source

      The Results and Analysis section describes the direction the other way around: students’ learning motivation contributes to learning creativity, and higher motivation is associated with higher creativity. The paper calls motivation—not creativity—the driving force behind learning activities. The supplied passages do not give page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • Rests on an assumption: Traditional curricula often 'shackle' creativity with rigid standards.
  • Premisecitation

    These low learning outcomes are often correlated with students' lack of emotional and motor involvement in the learning process.

    “These low learning outcomes are often correlated with students' lack of emotional and motor involvement in the learning process (Ramos-Campo & Clemente-Suárez, 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ramos-Campo & Clemente-Suárez, 2024 source

      The Discussion reports that the low-academic-performance group had lower motor-skill scores than the high-performance group, supporting a correlation between motor proficiency and academic outcomes. It does not establish that students lacked motor involvement in the learning process, and the cited passages do not address emotional involvement. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    By engaging in Show and Tell, students are actively and enjoyably practicing the material (retrieval practice).

    “By engaging in Show and Tell, students are actively and enjoyably practicing the material (retrieval practice) (Kilo et al., 2025;Maftuhah & Ariyati, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kilo et al., 2025 source

      The Abstract (page not provided) says technology-assisted Show and Tell increased student participation and improved speaking skills, supporting the point that students practiced actively. It does not say the practice was enjoyable or describe students recalling learned material as retrieval practice. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Maftuhah & Ariyati, 2022 source

      The Results and Discussion section (page not provided) says Show and Tell motivates children to participate actively, and reports that some volunteered eagerly. The Introduction says objects can prompt memories that children then describe. The paper does not establish that students enjoyably retrieve previously learned material as a form of retrieval practice; its focus is young children’s oral-language development. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The Show and Tell method has been shown to be effective in enhancing creative thinking skills because it requires students to represent their ideas through original objects or visuals.

    “Consistent with previous research, the Show and Tell method has been shown to be effective in enhancing creative thinking skills because it requires students to represent their ideas through original objects or visuals (Oktaviani et al., 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Oktaviani et al., 2024 source

      The Introduction describes Show and Tell as having students describe chosen objects or photos, and the Conclusion says the three methods can help students become more creative learners. Neither passage establishes that Show and Tell enhances creative thinking skills specifically, that the objects or visuals must be original, or that using them causes such an improvement. The reported effect size concerns English speaking skills. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    Overall, pretest results show that students' inventiveness was below ideal before therapy.

    “Overall, pretest results show that students' inventiveness was below ideal before therapy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
  • May combine two claims. 51
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 4
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    In the Discovery Learning model, teachers act as facilitators, guiding students to independently discover principles or concepts through experimentation and observation.

    “In this model, teachers act as facilitators, guiding students to independently discover principles or concepts through experimentation and observation (Ananda & Atmojo, 2022;Maghfiroh et al., 2023;Ranggoli et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ananda & Atmojo, 2022 source
    • cites Maghfiroh et al., 2023 source

      The ‘Student responses about the use of physics e-module’ section (page unavailable) describes students investigating a phenomenon, conducting a practicum, and drawing a conclusion from it. It does not describe teachers as facilitators or say that teachers guide students to discover principles or concepts independently. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ranggoli et al., 2025 source

      The indexed study description (unpaginated) says the experimental group used Discovery Learning, but it does not describe teachers as facilitators or students discovering concepts through experimentation and observation. Searches for those roles and activities returned no passage addressing them. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • Rests on an assumption: At the elementary school level, the Discovery Learning model is sometimes difficult to implement without engaging communication methods.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Discovery Learning model has long been recognized as an effective constructivist approach.

    “The Discovery Learning (DL) model has long been recognized as an effective constructivist approach (Ainiyah, 2024;Mokoginta et al., 2025;Satriani et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ainiyah, 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Mokoginta et al., 2025 source
    • cites Satriani et al., 2022 source

      The Literature Review describes discovery learning as active, learner-led problem solving, which is consistent with a constructivist approach. The Results and Discussion report improved writing scores for students taught using STAD based on discovery learning. The paper does not establish that discovery learning alone is broadly effective or that it has long been recognized as such; its effectiveness finding concerns a combined method in one EFL writing setting. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The show-and-tell method is highly effective for developing public speaking skills, self-confidence, and the courage to express opinions.

    “This method is highly effective for developing public speaking skills, self-confidence, and the courage to express opinions (Oktaviani et al., 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Oktaviani et al., 2024 source
    • Rests on an assumption: Elementary school students need tangible media to demonstrate what they have discovered.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The learning process in elementary schools is often one-way (teacher-centered), with students acting as passive recipients of information.

    “However, the reality on the ground shows that the learning process is often one-way (teacher-centered), with students acting more as passive recipients of information (Dahlan et al., 2025;Sanjiartha et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dahlan et al., 2025 source

      The paper’s Abstract says teaching is often teacher-focused and one-way, and that students tend to become passive. That supports the cited sentence’s general point, but the paper does not specifically establish it for elementary schools, as the supplied claim states. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Sanjiartha et al., 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Creativity is not merely artistic ability but also the ability to solve problems in new and unique ways.

    “Creativity is not merely artistic ability but also the ability to solve problems in new and unique ways (Henriksen et al., 2017;Muzaini et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Henriksen et al., 2017 source
    • cites Muzaini et al., 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Show and Tell method provides higher self-confidence and enthusiasm for elementary school students because they are given the role of 'resource person' for their peers.

    “This finding confirms previous research, which stated that the Show and Tell method provides higher self-confidence and enthusiasm for elementary school students because they are given the role of”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wiratna & Amelasasih, 2023 source

      The Finding and Discussion section reports increased self-confidence among six first-grade students and says they were enthusiastic about showing their work. It does not say that these outcomes occurred because students were given the role of ‘resource person’ for their peers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Yandri et al., 2022 source

      The Results and Discussion report that students became more excited and confident after show-and-tell, and describe them explaining objects and answering classmates’ questions. But the study was conducted at a junior high school, not an elementary school, and it does not establish that confidence and enthusiasm increased because students acted as ‘resource persons’ for peers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The statistical data distribution for student creativity posttest results shows an increase after learning; the mean score was 83.67, higher than the pretest; students' creative ratings were balanced and stable, with a median of 85.00 and a mode of 85; the standard deviation was 9.908.

    “The statistical data distribution for student creativity posttest results shows an increase after learning.The mean score was 83.67, higher than the pretest.Students' creative ratings were balanced and stable, with a median of 85.00 and a mode of 85.Because some students scored lower than normal, the mean score (85>83.67)was lower.The standard deviation was 9.908, showing that most students scored”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The results of observations of teacher activities in learning when implementing the show and tell learning method based on the discovery learning model have a positive impact, as evidenced by the effectiveness of learning and an increase in students' enthusiasm for learning.

    “The results of observations of teacher activities in learning when implementing the show and tell learning method based on the discovery learning model have a positive impact, as evidenced by the effectiveness of learning and an increase in students' enthusiasm for learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    According to the assessment of students' creativity levels converted into intervals on a scale of 100, 19 students (63.4%) were less creative and 6 (20%) were very less creative in the pretest stage; five students (16.6%) with interval scores of 60-74 were creative.

    “According to the assessment of students' creativity levels converted into intervals on a scale of 100, 19 students (63.4%) were less creative and 6 (20%) were very less creative in the pretest stage.Five students (16.6%) with interval scores of 60-74 were creative, indicating that some students had better creative thinking talents than others.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    During implementation of the learning technique, pupils completed assignments and demonstrated excitement for learning.

    “During implementation of the learning technique, pupils completed assignments and demonstrated excitement for learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Students enthusiastically participated in practical learning approaches in the fifth session, boosting their creativity and learning outcomes.

    “Students enthusiastically participated in practical learning approaches in the fifth session, boosting their creativity and learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Before using the learning approach, the teacher gave a pretest to introduce the material and assess students' ability; results showed that most pupils struggled with the questions.

    “Before using the learning approach, the teacher gave a pretest to introduce the material and assess students' ability.Results showed that most pupils struggled with the questions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Pretest data on PPKn learning results for Class V Students of primary school 126 Inpres Kariango: the mean creativity score was 49, which is poor; the median, mode, and mean scores were 45, 45, and 49, respectively.

    “Pretest data on PPKn learning results for Class V Students of primary school 126 Inpres Kariango.Researchers properly calculated pretest scores using statistical data.Before the research treatment, 30 students' creative levels were estimated from pretest data.According to the instrument's assessment criteria, the mean creativity score was 49, which is poor.The median, mode, and mean scores were 45”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Students become more engaged in asking questions and participating in class, demonstrating their understanding and curiosity.

    “Students become more engaged in asking questions and participating in class, demonstrating their understanding and curiosity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In the seventh meeting, all students presented and formed conclusions using show-and-tell learning material; the teacher explained the discovery learning model-based show-and-tell method in detail and met learning objectives; student development improved across assessments.

    “In the seventh meeting, all students presented and formed conclusions using showand-tell learning material.The teacher explained the discovery learning model-based show-and-tell method in detail and met learning objectives.Student development improved across assessments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The third session allowed students to perform a 'show' and deliver a 'tell' about the content they had learned; this helped students find as many relevant issues as possible.

    “The third session allowed students to perform a”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The second class used a short video and visuals of Indonesian unity to teach; this encouraged students to find initial issues in the learning content and then analyze and communicate them in language they understood, improving their creativity and mastery.

    “The second class used a short video and visuals of Indonesian unity to teach.This encouraged students to find initial issues in the learning content and then analyze and communicate them in language they understood, improving their creativity and mastery.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    During the posttest, students seemed more relaxed, indicating that they had a better understanding of unity in the learning material, improved their creative thinking skills, and achieved better learning outcomes than with the previous learning method.

    “During the posttest, students seemed more relaxed, indicating that they had a better understanding of unity in the learning material, improved their creative thinking skills, and achieved better learning outcomes than with the previous learning method.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Descriptive analysis showed that students scored 40-65 on the pretest for inventiveness; thus, 25 points were awarded for originality.

    “Descriptive analysis showed that students scored 40-65 on the pretest for inventiveness.Thus, 25 points were awarded for originality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After the researchers tallied the scores, the average student score was below the completion criterion, showing that the prior learning technique did not improve student knowledge, creativity, or learning outcomes.

    “After the researchers tallied the scores, the average student score was below the completion criterion, showing that the prior learning technique did not improve student knowledge, creativity, or learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The conversion of posttest scores into a 100-point interval scale reveals that students' understanding distribution has improved; no students are less or substantially less creative, hence all can be considered creative on a 60-100 scale; 6 students (20%) are creative with a value interval of 60-74, while 12 students (20%) are creative with 75-89 and highly creative with 90-100.

    “The conversion of posttest scores into a 100-point interval scale reveals that students' understanding distribution has improved.No students are less or substantially less creative, hence all can be considered creative on a 60-100 scale.6 students (20%) are creative with a value interval of 60-74, indicating that they may enhance their thinking and originality, while 12 students (20%) are creative”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A preliminary study by the author at primary school 126 Inpres Kariango shows that the Pancasila and Citizenship Education subject material has not been optimally mastered, indicated by students' learning outcomes and students' skills in expressing opinions or expressing their feelings becoming less confident.

    “A preliminary study by the author at primary school 126 Inpres Kariango shows that the Pancasila and Citizenship Education subject material has not been optimally mastered, indicated by students' learning outcomes and students' skills in expressing opinions or expressing their feelings becoming less confident.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The findings in Table 1 indicate that the adoption of this pedagogical approach enhances educators' instructional abilities while simultaneously fostering greater student comprehension and active participation in the learning process.

    “The findings in Table 1 indicate that the adoption of this pedagogical approach enhances educators' instructional abilities while simultaneously fostering greater student comprehension and active participation in the learning process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    A posttest was provided at the VIII meeting to assess students' learning after treatment; when giving the posttest, students seemed more relaxed, indicating that they had a better understanding of unity in the learning material, were more interactive, and had better creative thinking skills and learning outcomes than with the previous learning method.

    “A posttest was provided at the VIII meeting to assess students' learning after treatment.Using questions, the teacher assessed the learning method's impact.When giving the posttest, students seemed more relaxed, indicating that they had a better understanding of unity in the learning material, were more interactive, and had better creative thinking skills and learning outcomes than with the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Students presented four to five times in the fourth session; the teacher used the discovery learning model's show-and-tell method well, and students' grasp of the topic and learning methods increased their motivation in studying, creating a positive and participatory environment.

    “Students presented four to five times in the fourth session.In this lesson, the teacher used the discovery learning model's show-and-tell method well.Students' grasp of the topic and learning methods increased their motivation in studying, creating a positive and participatory environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    This study reveals that the discovery learning model-based show and tell strategy improves learning significantly; this learning style boosts student participation, comprehension, and engagement.

    “This study reveals that the discovery learning model-based show and tell strategy improves learning significantly.This learning style boosts student participation, comprehension, and engagement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the posttest, 9 pupils scored 70-79 (medium group), 10 scored 80-89 (high), and 9 scored in the very high category.

    “9 pupils scored 70-79 in the medium group, 10 in high (80-89), and 9 in very high with very high learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    After the posttest, the average score jumped to 82.47, and 63.4% of students fell in the 'High' to 'Very High' categories.

    “After the posttest, the average score jumped to 82.47.The distribution of scores shows that 63.4% of students now fall in the”
    • Also stated in: § 4. CONCLUSION · boosted
      “Student learning achievement improved dramatically, with an average posttest score of 82.47, with the majority of students (63.4%) now in the”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The improvements in creativity and learning outcomes observed from pretest to posttest are attributable to the show-and-tell/discovery learning treatment rather than to other factors.
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    In the posttest, 40% of students achieved the 'Very Creative' category and 40% the 'Creative' category, and all students were in the 'Creative' or 'Very Creative' categories.

    “A total of 40% of students achieved the”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Average student learning outcomes rose from 52.57 to 82.47, with 93.4% reaching moderate to very high.

    “(4) Average student learning outcomes rose from 52.57 to 82.47, with 93.4% reaching moderate to very high.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On a 0-100 scale, the fifth-grade students met learning outcome standards and scored optimally, getting good marks.

    “On a scale of 0-100, students met learning outcome standards and scored optimally, getting good marks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test for pretest student learning outcomes yielded 0.137, df 30, significance 0.158; posttest results were 0.098, df 30, significance 0.200.

    “The Kolomogorov-Smirnov normalcy test for pretest student learning outcomes yielded 0.137, df 30, and 0.158.Posttest results: 0.098, df 30, 0.200 significance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the student creativity analysis, the regression coefficient data shows that the constant value (intercept) is 24,400 with a significance value of 0.030, which is smaller than 0.05, indicating that this constant has a significant effect; if the posttest variable does not change, the pretest value will remain near 24,400; the regression coefficient for the posttest variable is 0.298 with a

    “In the student creativity analysis, the regression coefficient data shows that the constant value (intercept) is 24,400 with a significance value of 0.030, which is smaller than 0.05, indicating that this constant has a significant effect.If the posttest variable does not change, the pretest value will remain near 24,400.The regression coefficient for the posttest variable is 0.298 with a”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Shapiro-Wilk test yielded posttest statistical values of 0.931, df 30, significance 0.051 and 0.938, df 30, significance 0.81.

    “The Shapiro-Wilk test yielded posttest statistical values of 0.931, df 30, significance of 0.051 and 0.938, df 30, significance of 0.81.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The homogeneity test shows that the significance value exceeds 0.05 and that data between the creative data groups have a similar value distribution, meeting the homogeneity of variance categories.

    “The test findings reveal the variance differences between creative data groups using the discovery learning model's show and tell learning method.Significant value (Sig.)exceeds 0.05.Data between groups have a similar value distribution, meeting the homogeneity of variance categories.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Analysis of pretest data on PPKn learning outcomes given to 30 students at primary school 126 Inpres Kariango provides an initial picture of the level of mastery of the material before receiving treatment in the study; students' ability to understand basic PPKn concepts was still not optimal before being given treatment; a small number of students obtained results with low scores and lowered the

    “Analysis of pretest data on PPKn learning outcomes given to 30 students at primary school 126 Inpres Kariango provides an initial picture of the level of mastery of the material before receiving treatment in the study.Students' ability to understand basic PPKn concepts was still not optimal before being given treatment.A small number of students obtained results with low scores and lowered the”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the pretest, the average student score was 52.57, with the majority (53.5%) in the low category and no students in the high category.

    “In the pretest, the average student score was only 52.57, with the majority (53.5%) in the low category and no students in the high category.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Before the treatment (pretest), the average student creativity score was 49.00 (categorized as less creative); after implementing the Show and Tell method, the average creativity score increased to 83.67.

    “Before the treatment (pretest), the average student creativity score was only 49.00 (categorized as less creative).However, after implementing the Show and Tell method, the average creativity score increased sharply to 83.67.”
    • Also stated in: § 4. CONCLUSION · boosted
      “There was a significant increase in creativity, with the average student score jumping from 49.00 (less creative) on the pretest to 83.67 (creative/very creative) on the posttest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The improvements in creativity and learning outcomes observed from pretest to posttest are attributable to the show-and-tell/discovery learning treatment rather than to other factors.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This condition shows that kids' initial creativity is low to intermediate, with a wide range of talents.

    “This condition shows that kids' initial creativity is low to intermediate, with a wide range of talents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It motivates and encourages creative thinking and active learning, unlike the standard method.

    “It motivates and encourages creative thinking and active learning, unlike the standard method.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    According to Bruner, the essence of learning is how a person organizes what they already know.

    “According to Bruner, the essence of learning is how a person organizes what they already know (Ozdem-Yilmaz & Bilican, 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ozdem-Yilmaz & Bilican, 2025

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Observations in various elementary schools indicate that many teachers are trapped in the lecture method, considered the most efficient way to achieve curriculum targets.

    “Observations in various elementary schools indicate that many teachers are trapped in the lecture method, considered the most efficient way to achieve curriculum targets (Abduhrohman et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Abduhrohman et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This significantly improves their long-term memory, ultimately impacting their learning outcomes.

    “This significantly improves their long-term memory, ultimately impacting their learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Psychologically, a person will remember 90% of what they are taught or convey to others.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This teacher-centered situation results in low levels of creativity and suboptimal learning outcomes.

    “This situation results in low levels of creativity and suboptimal learning outcomes.”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “Conventional and boring learning paradigms typically lead to low creativity and learning outcomes in Pancasila and Citizenship Education.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Learning outcomes often only reach the lower cognitive levels (C1-C2).
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As a result, students become bored, and their creative potential is suppressed.

    “As a result, students become bored, and their creative potential is suppressed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The Kolomogorov-Smirnov normalcy test for pretest student learning outcomes yielded 0.137, df 30, and 0.158; posttest results: 0.098, df 30, 0.200 significance; the Shapiro-Wilk test yielded posttest statistical values of 0.931, df 30, significance of 0.051 and 0.938, df 30, significance of 0.81; since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the distribution data is normal and can be used for

    “The Kolomogorov-Smirnov normalcy test for pretest student learning outcomes yielded 0.137, df 30, and 0.158.Posttest results: 0.098, df 30, 0.200 significance.The Shapiro-Wilk test yielded posttest statistical values of 0.931, df 30, significance of 0.051 and 0.938, df 30, significance of 0.81.Since the significance value is greater than 0.05, the distribution data is normal and can be used for”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If this happens continuously, students' interest in learning will be lower and will certainly affect students' learning outcomes.

    “If this happens continuously, students' interest in learning will be lower and will certainly affect students' learning outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The results of the hypothesis test indicated that the posttest variable significantly influenced the increase in student creativity and learning outcomes, supported by normally distributed and homogeneous data.

    “Furthermore, the results of the hypothesis test indicated that the posttest variable significantly influenced the increase in student creativity and learning outcomes, supported by normally distributed and homogeneous data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The hypothesis test shows that this strategy boosts creativity and learning.

    “The hypothesis test shows that this strategy boosts creativity and learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisecitation

    Visual aids accelerate the understanding of abstract concepts.

    “The use of short videos as initial stimuli also aligns with studies of learning media that suggest visual aids accelerate the understanding of abstract concepts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The pretest and posttest data distributions are normal and can be used for parametric statistical analysis.

    “If the significance value is greater than 0.05, the data distribution is normal and can be used for parametric statistical analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Most pupils need learning approaches or models that improve learning.

    “Most pupils need learning approaches or models that improve learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The students seemed more relaxed during the posttest, showing that they had internalized the concept of unity and oneness through the presentation and Q&A.

    “The students seemed more relaxed during the posttest, showing that they had internalized the concept of unity and oneness through the presentation and Q&A.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Teachers can enhance their classroom management skills and provide constructive feedback by repeatedly implementing innovative methods.

    “Research shows that teachers can enhance their classroom management skills and provide constructive feedback by repeatedly implementing innovative methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This study strengthens our knowledge of how communicative strategies and discovery models improve primary school critical and creative thinking.

    “This study strengthens our knowledge of how communicative strategies and discovery models improve primary school critical and creative thinking.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The integration of the Discovery Learning model addresses the weaknesses of previous studies by ensuring that students not only 'show and tell' but also go through the stages of data processing and drawing strong conclusions (generalization).

    “The integration of the Discovery Learning model successfully addresses the weaknesses of previous studies by ensuring that students not only”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The median level is greater than the p-value of 0.05 and has the same significance level when assessed using the adjusted degrees of freedom of 0.733, indicating that the results are significant or homogenous; these test results demonstrate that the show and tell learning approach based on the discovery learning model meets the variance homogeneity of learning outcome data groups; parametric tests

    “The median level is greater than the p-value of 0.05 and has the same significance level when assessed using the adjusted degrees of freedom of 0.733, indicating that the results are significant or homogenous.These test results demonstrate that the show and tell learning approach based on the discovery learning model meets the variance homogeneity of learning outcome data groups.Parametric tests”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    In conclusion, the Discovery Learning-based Show and Tell method enhances student learning in the PPKn subject, fosters creativity, and enhances interaction.

    “In conclusion, the Discovery Learning-based Show and Tell method enhances student learning in the PPKn subject, fosters creativity, and enhances interaction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
58 of 58
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Learning outcomes often only reach the lower cognitive levels (C1-C2).

    “Learning outcomes often only reach the lower cognitive levels (C1-C2).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Psychologically, a person will remember 90% of what they are taught or convey to others.

    “Psychologically, a person will remember 90% of what they are taught or convey to others.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Elementary school students need tangible media to demonstrate what they have discovered.

    “Elementary school students need tangible media to demonstrate what they have discovered.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    At the elementary school level, the Discovery Learning model is sometimes difficult to implement without engaging communication methods.

    “Although Discovery Learning is powerful in building cognitive structures, at the elementary school level, this model is sometimes difficult to implement without engaging communication methods.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Traditional curricula often 'shackle' creativity with rigid standards.

    “Unfortunately, traditional curricula often”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The improvements in creativity and learning outcomes observed from pretest to posttest are attributable to the show-and-tell/discovery learning treatment rather than to other factors.

    “Figure 1.One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design Description: O1: Initial test score (Pre-test) before treatment.X: Treatment using the Show and Tell method based on Discovery Learning.O2: Final test score (Post-test) after treatment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The sample of 30 fifth-grade students at one primary school is representative enough to generalize the effectiveness of the method to elementary school students.

    “It provides empirical evidence that combining discovery learning with show and tell (simple presentations) is highly effective for elementary school students.”
7 of 7

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conclusion claims significance for learning outcomes despite a nonsignificant test

    Major

    The conclusion says the hypothesis test found a significant effect on learning outcomes, but the learning-outcome hypothesis-testing section reports p = 0.109 and explicitly says the result was not significant.

  • Reported fifth-grade sample size changes from 33 to 30

    Minor

    The methods say all 33 fifth-grade students were sampled, while the abstract says the study included 30 fifth graders. The reported statistics also use N = 30.

  • Third-meeting student activity percentage is overstated

    Minor

    A score of 4 out of 13 is approximately 30.77%, not 40%.

    Reported 40 · recomputed 30.769231

  • Pretest very-low learning-outcome percentage does not match its frequency

    Minor

    Table 10 reports 10 students out of 30 as 32.2%; that frequency is 33.33%.

    Reported 32.2 · recomputed 33.333333

  • Teacher activity score does not yield the reported 70%

    Minor

    A score of 10 out of 15 is 66.67%, not 70%.

    Reported 70 · recomputed 66.666667

  • Shapiro-Wilk posttest significance differs between table and text

    Minor

    Table 7 gives the posttest Shapiro-Wilk significance as 0.081, but the accompanying account gives it as 0.81.

  • Second-meeting student activity percentage is overstated

    Minor

    A score of 3 out of 13 is approximately 23.08%, not 35%.

    Reported 35 · recomputed 23.076923

  • Claim that all students were creative conflicts with the posttest categories

    Minor

    The discussion places every student in the Creative or Very Creative categories, whereas Table 6 places six students in the Quite Creative category.

  • Seventh-meeting student activity percentage is incorrect

    Minor

    A score of 12 out of 13 is approximately 92.31%, not 90%.

    Reported 90 · recomputed 92.307692

  • Twelve creativity posttest students are mislabeled as 20%

    Minor

    With 30 students, 12 students constitute 40%, not 20%. Table 6 also reports 40% for each category containing 12 students.

    Reported 20 · recomputed 40

10 of 10

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nurdiansyah, E. (2023). The Influence Of The School Environment And Family Environment On Character-Forming Students In Sipala State 1 Sd Makassar City. In AICOMS: Annual Interdisciplinary Conference on Muslim Societies (Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 111-136). https://prosiding.insuriponorogo.ac.id/index.php/aicoms/article/view/143

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nur, Z., Mulyadi, M., & Nurdiansyah, E.
Affiliations
Universitas Islam Makassar (ID)
Venue
ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review
Published
2025-12-27
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
564-581
ISSN
  • 2809-3682 (ISSN-L)
  • 2809-7505
OpenAlex
W7117481489
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Open access
Locations
ETDC Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Pancasila Values in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
Keywords
discovery learning, creativity, learning outcomes, Pancasila and civic education, citizenship education, elementary school students, fifth grade students, student participation, student-centered learning, critical and creative thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review