Cited by 47Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchReproductive System and PregnancyBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies are associated with pregnancy loss in women with the lupus anticoagulant

Sailer, Thomas, Zoghlami, Claudia, Kurz, Christine, Rumpold, Helmut, Quehenberger, Peter, Panzer, Simon, Pabinger, Ingrid·2006·Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Abstract

Summary The presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA) predisposes to fetal loss and to venous and arterial thrombosis; however, a subgroup of women is unaffected by pregnancy loss. Currently, no predictive markers are available for the identification of women positive for LA at increased risk for pregnancy loss. It was the aim of our study to investigate whether increased anti-β2-GPI-antibodies predict pregnancy loss in women positive for LA. We performed a cross-sectional study in a cohort of 39 women with persistent LA, who had in total 111 pregnancies. Fifteen women had exclusively normal pregnancies (30 pregnancies) and 24 women had pregnancy losses (81 pregnancies). Anti-β2-GPI-antibodies were determined using a semiquantitative enzyme linked immunoassay (QUANTA Lite™ β2 GPI IgG and IgM; Inova Diagnostics). Increased levels of anti-β2-GPI antibodies were significantly associated with pregnancy loss [odds ratio (OR) 9.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6 – 56.4].This risk was even higher in the subgroup of women (n=16) with more than two miscarriages or fetal loss after the first trimester [OR 13.1, 95% CI 1.4 – 126.3]. There was no significant association between anticardiolipin antibodies and pregnancy loss [OR 3.5, 95% CI 0.7 – 17.6].The coexistence of anti-β2-GPI and anticardiolipin antibodies was also predictive for pregnancy loss [OR 6.1, 95%CI 1.3 – 29.7]. Interestingly, the prevalence of thrombosis was similar between women with normal pregnancy (87%) and those with pregnancy loss (75%). We conclude that increased levels of anti-β2-GPI antibodies are predictive for pregnancy loss among women positive for LA, and that prophylactic treatment should be considered in these women even without a history of previous pregnancy loss.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1160/th06-01-0044

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sailer, T., Zoghlami, C., Kurz, C., Rumpold, H., Quehenberger, P., Panzer, S., & Pabinger, I.
Affiliations
Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Pabinger, Ingrid
Venue
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Published
2006
Volume
95
Issue
05
Pages
796-801
ISSN
  • 0340-6245 (ISSN-L)
  • 2567-689X
OpenAlex
W4296980932
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Thrombosis and Haemostasis (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medizinisch-Wissenschaftlichen Fond des Bürgermeisters der Bundeshauptstadt Wien (2027)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, miscarriage, anticardiolipin antibodies, thrombosis, thromboprophylaxis, risk prediction, pregnancy outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review