The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of arterial proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans on low density lipoprotein oxidation and its uptake by human macrophages and arterial smooth muscle cells.
Abstract
The reversible interaction of low density lipoprotein (LDL) with arterial chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) or glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) selects LDL particles with a high affinity for sulfated GAGs and also induces modifications in apolipoprotein B (apo B) and the lipid organization of the lipoprotein. In the present work we studied the effect that the reversible interaction with sulfated polysaccharides has on the susceptibility of LDL to in vitro oxidation. For this purpose soluble, nonaggregated CSPG- or GAG-treated LDL was subjected to oxidation in the presence of 5 microM CuSO4 for as long as 48 hours. The rate of formation of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, the decrease in isoelectric point, the increase in relative electrophoretic mobility of LDL, the higher degradation rate by human macrophages, and the lower degradation rate by human arterial smooth muscle cells showed that LDLs exposed to CSPGs and GAGs were significantly more susceptible to oxidation than native LDL. Results from competition experiments indicate that C6S-treated LDL after 4 hours of oxidation is taken up via the acetylated LDL receptor in human macrophages. Coincubation of lipoproteins with human macrophages or human arterial smooth muscle cells for 24 hours also indicated that C6S-treated LDL was more susceptible to cell-induced modifications than native LDL. The occurrence in vivo of similar processes may contribute to focal retention, increased rate oxidation of LDL in the arterial intima, and foam cell formation during atherogenesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipoprotein-receptor interactions
Innerarity, T. L., Pitas, R. E., & Mahley, R. W. (1986) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/0076-6879(86)29091-6 · Cited by 186
Cited by
The Response-to-Retention Hypothesis of Early Atherogenesis
Williams, K. J., & Tabas, I. (1995) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/01.atv.15.5.551 · Cited by 1,413
Subendothelial retention of atherogenic lipoproteins in early atherosclerosis
Skålén, K., Gustafsson, M., Rydberg, E. K., Hultén, L. M., Wiklund, O., Innerarity, T. L., & Borén, J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature00804 · Cited by 1,019
Endothelial permeability, LDL deposition, and cardiovascular risk factors—a review
Mundi, S., Massaro, M., Scoditti, E., Carluccio, M. A., van Hinsbergh, V. W. M., Iruela-Arispe, M. L., & De Caterina, R. (2018) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvx226 · Cited by 367
Nakashima, Y., Wight, T. N., & Sueishi, K. (2008) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvn099 · Cited by 299
Öörni, K., Pentikäinen, M. O., Ala-Korpela, M., & Kovanen, P. T. (2000) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-2275(20)31964-7 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Hurt-Camejo, E., Camejo, G., Rosengren, B., López, F., Ahlström, C., Fager, G., & Bondjers, G.
- Venue
- Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis: A Journal of Vascular Biology
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 569-583
- ISSN
- 1049-8834 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011014206
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of arterial proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans on low density lipoprotein oxidation and its uptake by human macrophages and arterial smooth muscle cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.atv.12.5.569
- The paper
- Hurt-Camejo, E., Camejo, G., Rosengren, B., López, F., Ahlström, C., Fager, G., & Bondjers, G. (1992). Effect of arterial proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans on low density lipoprotein oxidation and its uptake by human macrophages and arterial smooth muscle cells. Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis: A Journal of Vascular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.12.5.569
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.