Cited by 62Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Cholesterol Reduction and Clinical Benefit: Are There Limits to Our Expectations?

Open access
Fager, Gunnar, Wiklund, Olov·1997·Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology

Abstract

Abstract Encouraging intervention trials drive our expectations toward more aggressive cholesterol-lowering therapies, lower target levels, and less severe hypercholesterolemia. Available studies may predict which patients, degrees of total cholesterol (TC) reduction, and baseline and target levels of TC provide the most clinical benefit. Data were pooled from seven primary and nine secondary controlled trials with major coronary heart disease (CHD) events as primary endpoints. The analysis showed that we can expect large reductions in CHD from TC reduction in primary and secondary prevention. However, the reduction is much larger in subjects with high TC and/or previous CHD events. The percent reduction in CHD increased exponentially with increasing percent TC reductions, which predicted >70% of the change in CHD. Consequently, we cannot expect cost-effective clinical benefits from mean reductions in TC >15 (LDL cholesterol >20)%. The TC level at the study endpoint correlated with CHD incidence irrespective of the study group and explained almost 45% of CHD incidence. The relationship was progressive and leveled off at a TC level below about 150 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) (LDL cholesterol ≈110 mg/dL [≈2.8 mmol/L]). Little extra clinical benefit can be expected from further reductions. We can expect an average 2% reduction in CHD events per percent reduction in TC. We can also expect a 2-fold greater clinical benefit among subjects with high initial TC levels than among those with low levels. Finally, we can expect that the cholesterol-attributable risk is reset to that predicted by the TC level achieved within 4 to 6 years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.atv.17.12.3527

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Committee of Principal Investigators. A cooperative trial in the prevention of ischaemic heart disease using clofibrate. Br Heart J. 1978;40:1069-1118.
  2. Lipid Research Clinics Program. The Lipid Research Clinics Cor- onary Primary Prevention Trial results. I. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1984;25:351-364.
  3. Group of Physicians of the Newcastle upon Tyne Region. Trial of clofibrate in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease. Br Med J. 1971;4:767-775.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fager, G., & Wiklund, O.
Affiliations
Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
Venue
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Published
1997-12
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
3527-3533
ISSN
  • 1079-5642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4636
OpenAlex
W1979794075
Cited by
62
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Hjärt-Lungfonden
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
cholesterol-lowering therapy, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, coronary artery disease, hypercholesterolemia, clinical benefit, cost-effectiveness, primary and secondary prevention
MeSH terms
Anticholesteremic Agents, Cholesterol, Clinical Trials as Topic, Coronary Disease, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review