Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 567

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Assessment of Survival in Patients With Primary Pulmonary Hypertension: Importance of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

Open access
Wensel, Roland, Opitz, Christian F., Anker, Stefan D., Winkler, Jörg, Höffken, Gert, Kleber, Franz X., Sharma, Rakesh, Hummel, Manfred, Hetzer, Roland, Ewert, Ralf·2002·Circulation

Abstract

Background — Primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) is a life-threatening disease. Prognostic assessment is an important factor in determining medical treatment and lung transplantation. Whether cardiopulmonary exercise testing data predict survival has not been reported previously. Methods and Results — We studied 86 patients with PPH (58 female, age 46±2 years, median NYHA class III) between 1996 and 2001 who were followed up in a tertiary referral center. Right heart catheterization was performed and serum uric acid levels were measured in all patients. Seventy patients were able to undergo exercise testing. At the start of the study, the average pulmonary artery pressure was 60±2 mm Hg, average pulmonary vascular resistance was 1664±81 dyne · s · cm −5 , average serum uric acid level was 7.5±0.35 mg/dL, and average peak oxygen uptake during exercise (peak V̇ o 2 ) was 11.2±0.5 mL · kg −1 · min −1 . During follow-up (mean: 567±48 days), 28 patients died and 16 underwent lung transplantation (1-year cumulative event-free survival: 68%; 95% CI 58 to 78). The strongest predictors of impaired survival were low peak V̇ o 2 ( P <0.0001) and low systolic blood pressure at peak exercise (peak SBP; P <0.0001). In a multivariable analysis, serum uric acid levels (all P <0.005) and diastolic blood pressure at peak exercise independently predicted survival ( P <0.05). Patients with peak V̇ o 2 ≤10.4 mL · kg −1 · min −1 and peak SBP ≤120 mm Hg (ie, 2 risk factors) had poor survival rates at 12 months (23%), whereas patients with 1 or none of these risk factors had better survival rates (79% and 97%, respectively). Conclusions — Peak V̇ o 2 and peak SBP are independent and strong predictors of survival in PPH patients. Hemodynamic parameters, although also accurate predictors, provide no independent prognostic information.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000022687.18568.2a

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 567

Metadata

Authors
Wensel, R., Opitz, C. F., Anker, S. D., Winkler, J., Höffken, G., Kleber, F. X., Sharma, R., Hummel, M., Hetzer, R., & Ewert, R.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2002-07-16
Volume
106
Issue
3
Pages
319-324
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2168536244
Cited by
567
References
0
FWCI
14.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Survival in Patients With Primary Pulmonary Hypertension: Importance of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000022687.18568.2a
The paper
Wensel, R., Opitz, C. F., Anker, S. D., Winkler, J., Höffken, G., Kleber, F. X., Sharma, R., Hummel, M., Hetzer, R., & Ewert, R. (2002). Assessment of Survival in Patients With Primary Pulmonary Hypertension: Importance of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000022687.18568.2a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.