The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Segmental Ostial Ablation to Isolate the Pulmonary Veins During Atrial Fibrillation: Feasibility and Mechanistic Insights
Open accessAbstract
Background— The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and mechanistic implications of segmental pulmonary vein (PV) ostial ablation during atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and Results— Forty consecutive patients underwent PV isolation for AF. Among 125 PVs targeted for isolation, ablation was performed during AF in 70 veins and during sinus rhythm in 55 veins. A decapolar Lasso catheter was positioned near the ostium. During AF, ostial ablation was performed near the Lasso catheter electrodes that recorded a tachycardia with a cycle length shorter than in the adjacent left atrium. During sinus rhythm, ostial ablation was guided by PV potentials. Complete PV isolation was achieved in 70 PVs (100%) ablated during AF and in 53 PVs (96%) ablated during sinus rhythm ( P =0.4). The mean durations of radiofrequency energy needed for isolation were 7.4±4.4 and 5.2±3.9 minutes during AF and sinus rhythm, respectively ( P <0.01). Before ablation, an immediate recurrence of AF (IRAF), occurred after cardioversion in 18 of 40 patients, and IRAF was consistently abolished by PV isolation. The probability of AF termination during isolation of a PV was directly related to the extent of tachycardia in that vein. As more PVs were isolated, induction of persistent AF by rapid pacing became less likely. Conclusions— Segmental ostial ablation guided by PV tachycardia during AF is feasible and as efficacious as during sinus rhythm. The responses to cardioversion, ablation, and rapid pacing observed in this study imply that IRAF is triggered by the PVs and that PV tachycardias may play an important role in the perpetuation of AF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Calkins, H., Hindricks, G., Cappato, R., Kim, Y.-H., Saad, E. B., Aguinaga, L., Akar, J. G., Badhwar, V., Brugada, J., Camm, J., et al. (2017) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012 · Cited by 2,755
Calkins, H., Kuck, K. H., Cappato, R., Brugada, J., Camm, A. J., Chen, S.-A., Crijns, H. J. G., Damiano, R. J., Davies, D. W., DiMarco, J., et al. (2012) · Europace · doi:10.1093/europace/eus027 · Cited by 2,722
Self-citationCalkins, H., Kuck, K. H., Cappato, R., Brugada, J., Camm, A. J., Chen, S.-A., Crijns, H. J. G., Damiano, R. J., Davies, D. W., DiMarco, J., et al. (2012) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.12.016 · Cited by 1,456
Self-citationCastellá, M., Pereda, D., Mestres, C. A., Gómez, F., Quintana, E., & Mulet, J. (2010) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.009 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Oral, H., Knight, B. P., Özaydın, M., Chugh, A., Lai, S. W. K., Scharf, C., Hassan, S., Greenstein, R., Han, J. D., Pelosi, F., Strickberger, S. A., & Morady, F.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2002-09-03
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1256-1262
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2139540278
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Segmental Ostial Ablation to Isolate the Pulmonary Veins During Atrial Fibrillation: Feasibility and Mechanistic Insights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000027821.55835.00
- The paper
- Oral, H., Knight, B. P., Özaydın, M., Chugh, A., Lai, S. W. K., Scharf, C., Hassan, S., Greenstein, R., Han, J. D., Pelosi, F., Strickberger, S. A., & Morady, F. (2002). Segmental Ostial Ablation to Isolate the Pulmonary Veins During Atrial Fibrillation: Feasibility and Mechanistic Insights. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000027821.55835.00
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.