Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 660

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neutrophil Infiltration of Culprit Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes

Naruko, Takahiko, Ueda, Makiko, Haze, Kazuo, van der Wal, Allard C., van der Loos, Chris M., Itoh, Akira, Komatsu, Ryushi, Ikura, Yoshihiro, Ogami, Masayuki, Shimada, Yoshihisa, Ehara, Shoichi, Yoshiyama, Minoru, Takeuchi, Kazuhide, Yoshikawa, Junichi, Becker, Anton E.·2002·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Neutrophils in unstable atherosclerotic lesions have not received much consideration, despite accumulating evidence suggesting a link between systemic inflammation and acute coronary syndromes. Methods and Results— Coronary artery segments were obtained at autopsy from 13 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI); 8 had a ruptured and 5 an eroded plaque. Patients (n=45) who had died of noncardiovascular diseases served as reference. Atherectomy specimens were obtained from 35 patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP) and from 32 patients with unstable angina pectoris (UAP). Antibodies against CD66b, elastase, myeloperoxidase, and CD11b identified neutrophils; CD10 identified neutral endopeptidase (NEP). CD66b-positive and NEP-positive neutrophils were counted and expressed as a number per square millimeter of tissue. All specimens with plaque rupture or erosion showed distinct neutrophil infiltration; the number did not differ between ruptured and eroded plaques. However, the number of NEP-positive neutrophils was significantly higher ( P <0.0001) in ruptured plaques than in eroded plaques. UAP patients showed neutrophils in 14 of 32 culprit lesions; in SAP only 2 of 35 lesions contained neutrophils. The number of neutrophils and NEP-positive cells in patients with UAP was significantly higher (neutrophils, P <0.0005; NEP-positive cells, P <0.005) than in patients with SAP. Conclusions— The observations suggest that neutrophil infiltration is actively associated with acute coronary events. The high number of NEP-positive neutrophils in ruptured plaques, compared with eroded plaques, may reflect differences in the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000042674.89762.20

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 660

Metadata

Authors
Naruko, T., Ueda, M., Haze, K., van der Wal, A. C., van der Loos, C. M., Itoh, A., Komatsu, R., Ikura, Y., Ogami, M., Shimada, Y., Ehara, S., Yoshiyama, M., Takeuchi, K., Yoshikawa, J., & Becker, A. E.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2002-12-03
Volume
106
Issue
23
Pages
2894-2900
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2164720318
Cited by
660
References
0
FWCI
6.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neutrophil Infiltration of Culprit Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000042674.89762.20
The paper
Naruko, T., Ueda, M., Haze, K., van der Wal, A. C., van der Loos, C. M., Itoh, A., Komatsu, R., Ikura, Y., Ogami, M., Shimada, Y., Ehara, S., Yoshiyama, M., Takeuchi, K., Yoshikawa, J., & Becker, A. E. (2002). Neutrophil Infiltration of Culprit Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000042674.89762.20

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.