The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antianginal and Antiischemic Effects of Ivabradine, an I f Inhibitor, in Stable Angina: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicentered, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background— Heart rate reduction should benefit patients with chronic stable angina by improving myocardial perfusion and reducing myocardial oxygen demand. This study evaluated the antianginal and antiischemic effects of ivabradine, a new heart rate–lowering agent that acts specifically on the sinoatrial node. Methods and Results— In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 360 patients with a ≥3-month history of chronic stable angina were randomly assigned to receive ivabradine (2.5, 5, or 10 mg BID) or placebo for 2 weeks, followed by an open-label 2- or 3-month extension on ivabradine (10 mg BID) and a 1-week randomized withdrawal to ivabradine (10 mg BID) or placebo. Primary efficacy criteria were changes in time to 1-mm ST-segment depression and time to limiting angina during bicycle exercise (exercise tolerance tests), performed at trough of drug activity. In the per-protocol population (n=257), time to 1-mm ST-segment depression increased in the 5 and 10 mg BID groups ( P <0.005); time to limiting angina increased in the 10 mg BID group ( P <0.05). Deterioration in all exercise tolerance test parameters occurred in patients who received placebo during randomized withdrawal (all P <0.02) but not in those still receiving ivabradine. No rebound phenomena were observed on treatment cessation. Conclusions— Ivabradine produces dose-dependent improvements in exercise tolerance and time to development of ischemia during exercise. These results suggest that ivabradine, representing a novel class of antianginal drugs, is effective and safe during 3 months of use; longer-term safety requires additional assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fox, K., Ford, I., Steg, P. G., Tendera, M., & Ferrari, R. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61170-8 · Cited by 1,099
Self-citationResting Heart Rate in Cardiovascular Disease
Fox, K., Borer, J. S., Camm, A. J., Danchin, N., Ferrari, R., Lopez Sendon, J. L., Steg, P. G., Tardif, J.-C., Tavazzi, L., & Tendera, M. (2007) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.079 · Cited by 1,062
Self-citationFihn, S. D., Gardin, J. M., Abrams, J., Berra, K., Blankenship, J. C., Dallas, A. P., Douglas, P. S., Foody, J. M., Gerber, T. C., Hinderliter, A. L., et al. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e318277d6a0 · Cited by 845
Genesis and Regulation of the Heart Automaticity
Mangoni, M. E., & Nargeot, J. (2008) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00018.2007 · Cited by 600
DiFrancesco, D., & Camm, J. A. (2004) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-200464160-00003 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Borer, J. S., Fox, K., Jaillon, P., & Lerebours, G.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2003-02-18
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 817-823
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2001966526
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antianginal and Antiischemic Effects of Ivabradine, an I f Inhibitor, in Stable Angina: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicentered, Placebo-Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000048143.25023.87
- The paper
- Borer, J. S., Fox, K., Jaillon, P., & Lerebours, G. (2003). Antianginal and Antiischemic Effects of Ivabradine, an I f Inhibitor, in Stable Angina: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicentered, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000048143.25023.87
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.