Cited by 19Health and Medical Research ImpactsClinical practice guidelines implementationHealth Sciences Research and Education

Gap Between Clinical Trials and Clinical Practice: Lessons From the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI)

Open access
Frye, Robert L., Brooks, Maria Mori, Nesto, Richard W.·2003·Circulation

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000066419.24566.28

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The gap between clinical research and actual practice depends on factors such as the quality, size, and relevance of research and the incentives to adopt practice changes.

    “The much lamented gap depends on a number of factors, including the quality, magnitude, and relevance of research, as well as the incentives to adopting practice changes.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Feit F, Brooks MM, Sopko G, et al. Long term clinical outcome in the BARI Registry: comparison with the randomized trial. Circulation. 2000; 101:2795-2802.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frye, R. L., Brooks, M. M., & Nesto, R. W.
Affiliations
Lahey Hospital and Medical Center (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2003-04-15
Volume
107
Issue
14
Pages
1837-1839
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2003842914
Cited by
19
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2013: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
clinical trials, clinical practice, knowledge-practice gap, clinical translation
MeSH terms
Coronary Artery Bypass, Cardiology, Coronary Artery Disease, Decision Making, Humans, Motivation, Myocardial Revascularization, Physicians, Professional Practice, Time Factors, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Information Dissemination, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review