Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Additive Protection of the Ischemic Heart Ex Vivo by Combined Treatment With δ-Protein Kinase C Inhibitor and ε-Protein Kinase C Activator

Inagaki, Koichi, Hahn, Harvey S., Dorn, Gerald W., Mochly-Rosen, Daria·2003·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Protein kinase C (PKC) plays a major role in cardioprotection from ischemia/reperfusion injury. Using an HIV-1 Tat protein–derived peptide to mediate rapid and efficient transmembrane delivery of peptide regulators of PKC translocation and function, we examined the cardioprotective effect of selective δ-PKC inhibitor (δV1-1) and ε-PKC activator (ψεRACK) peptides for ischemia/reperfusion damage in isolated perfused rat hearts. Furthermore, we examined the protective effects of these PKC isozymes in isolated perfused hearts subjected to ischemia/reperfusion damage using transgenic mice expressing these peptides specifically in their cardiomyocytes. Methods and Results— In isolated perfused rat hearts, administration of δV1-1 but not ψεRACK during reperfusion improved cardiac function and decreased creatine phosphokinase release. In contrast, pretreatment with ψεRACK but not δV1-1, followed by a 10-minute washout before ischemia/reperfusion, also improved cardiac function and decreased creatine phosphokinase release. Furthermore, administration of ψεRACK before ischemia followed by δV1-1 during reperfusion only conferred greater cardioprotective effects than that obtained by each peptide treatment alone. Both the δ-PKC inhibitor and ε-PKC activator conferred cardioprotection against ischemia/reperfusion injury in transgenic mice expressing these peptides in the heart, and coexpression of both peptides conferred greater cardioprotective effects than that obtained by the expression of each peptide alone. Conclusions— δ-PKC inhibitor prevents reperfusion injury, and ε-PKC activator mimics ischemic preconditioning. Furthermore, treatment with both peptides confers additive cardioprotective effects. Therefore, these peptides mediate cardioprotection by regulating ischemia/reperfusion damage at distinct time points.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000081943.93653.73

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Inagaki, K., Hahn, H. S., Dorn, G. W., & Mochly-Rosen, D.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2003-08-19
Volume
108
Issue
7
Pages
869-875
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2077172545
Cited by
202
References
1
FWCI
14.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Additive Protection of the Ischemic Heart Ex Vivo by Combined Treatment With δ-Protein Kinase C Inhibitor and ε-Protein Kinase C Activator. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000081943.93653.73
The paper
Inagaki, K., Hahn, H. S., Dorn, G. W., & Mochly-Rosen, D. (2003). Additive Protection of the Ischemic Heart Ex Vivo by Combined Treatment With δ-Protein Kinase C Inhibitor and ε-Protein Kinase C Activator. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000081943.93653.73

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.