The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Soluble CD40L: Risk Prediction After Acute Coronary Syndromes
Open accessAbstract
Background— Elevated plasma concentrations of soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) indicate increased risk for future cardiovascular events in apparently healthy women. This study tested the hypothesis that plasma sCD40L, alone or in combination with troponin (cTnI) or C-reactive protein (CRP), may identify patients with acute coronary syndromes at heightened risk for recurrent cardiac events. Methods and Results— In a nested case-control study (cases, n=195; controls, n=195) within the OPUS-TIMI16 trial, patients with the prespecified study end points death, myocardial infarction (MI), or congestive heart failure (CHF) within 10 months had significantly higher median (25th, 75th percentiles) sCD40L plasma levels than did controls (0.78 [0.34, 1.73] ng/mL versus 0.52 [0.16, 1.42] ng/mL, P <0.002). After adjustment for other risk predictors and levels of cTnI and CRP, sCD40L levels above median were associated with higher risk for death, MI, and the composite death/MI or death/MI/CHF (adjusted hazard ratios, 1.9 [ P <0.05], 1.9 [ P <0.001], 1.9 [ P <0.001], and 1.8 [ P <0.01], respectively). Interestingly, patients with elevated plasma levels of sCD40L and cTnI showed a markedly increased risk of death, MI, or death/MI/CHF compared with patients with the lowest levels of both markers (adjusted hazard ratios, 12.1, 7.2, and 4.3, respectively; all P <0.01). Conclusions— Elevated plasma levels of sCD40L identify patients with acute coronary syndromes at heightened risk of death and recurrent MI independent of other predictive variables, including cTnI and CRP. Notably, combined assessment of sCD40L with cTnI complements prognostic information for death and MI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Disease: Molecular Basis and Practical Considerations
Vasan, R. S. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.104.482570 · Cited by 1,212
Role of the renin–angiotensin system in vascular inflammation
Marchesi, C., Paradis, P., & Schiffrin, E. L. (2008) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2008.05.003 · Cited by 432
Savoia, C., & Schiffrin, E. L. (2007) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20060247 · Cited by 326
da Luz, P. L., Bertini, P. J., & Favarato, D. (2005) · Clinics · doi:10.1590/s1807-59322005000500011 · Cited by 13
“For instance, the Orbofiban in Patients with Unstable Coronary Syndromes—Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction-16 (OPUS-TIMI-16) found that elevated plasma levels of sCD40L identify patients at increased risk of death and recurrent myocardial infarction independent of other predictive variables, including troponin I a…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Varo, N., de Lemos, J. A., Libby, P., Morrow, D. A., Murphy, S. A., Nuzzo, R., Gibson, C. M., Cannon, C. P., Braunwald, E., & Schönbeck, U.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2003-09-02
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1049-1052
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2063562293
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.