Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coronary Risk Evaluation in Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack and Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Stroke Council and the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

Open access
Adams, Robert J., Chimowitz, Marc I., Alpert, Joseph S., Awad, Issam A., Cerqueria, Manuel D., Fayad, Pierre, Taubert, Kathryn A.·2003·Circulation

Abstract

S troke and myocardial infarction (MI) share common risk factors and pathological mechanisms, and coronary artery disease (CHD) is an important cause of death in patients with cerebrovascular disease.This Scientific Statement addresses issues in management of the relatively healthy patient with brain ischemia (a transient ischemic attack [TIA] or an ischemic stroke) who does not have recognized CHD but often has risk factors in addition to having had a TIA or stroke that indicate an increased likelihood of disability or death from cardiac disease in the future.This Statement should not be confused with the official American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) practice guidelines.The reader is referred to the ACC/AHA guidelines for management of recognized and symptomatic CHD 1 and the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) 2 and American Stroke Association (ASA) [3][4][5] guidelines for evaluation of cardiac causes of TIA and stroke, which are important related but separate issues.The American Heart Association makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel.Specifically, all members of the writing group are required to complete and submit a Disclosure Questionnaire showing all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000090444.87006.cf

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Adams, R. J., Chimowitz, M. I., Alpert, J. S., Awad, I. A., Cerqueria, M. D., Fayad, P., & Taubert, K. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2003-09-09
Volume
108
Issue
10
Pages
1278-1290
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2168758975
Cited by
271
References
10
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coronary Risk Evaluation in Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack and Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Stroke Council and the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000090444.87006.cf
The paper
Adams, R. J., Chimowitz, M. I., Alpert, J. S., Awad, I. A., Cerqueria, M. D., Fayad, P., & Taubert, K. A. (2003). Coronary Risk Evaluation in Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack and Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Stroke Council and the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000090444.87006.cf

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.