Cited by 739Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthCardiovascular Effects of Exercise

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exercise Capacity and the Risk of Death in Women: The St James Women Take Heart Project

Abstract

Background— Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among women and accounts for more than half of their deaths. Women have been underrepresented in most studies of cardiovascular disease. Reduced physical fitness has been shown to increase the risk of death in men. Exercise capacity measured by exercise stress test is an objective measure of physical fitness. The hypothesis that reduced exercise capacity is associated with an increased risk of death was investigated in a cohort of 5721 asymptomatic women who underwent baseline examinations in 1992. Methods and Results— Information collected at baseline included medical and family history, demographic characteristics, physical examination, and symptom-limited stress ECG, using the Bruce protocol. Exercise capacity was measured in metabolic equivalents (MET). Nonfasting blood was analyzed at baseline. A National Death Index search was performed to identify all-cause death and date of death up to the end of 2000. The mean age of participants at baseline was 52±11 years. Framingham Risk Score–adjusted hazards ratios (with 95% CI) of death associated with MET levels of <5, 5 to 8, and >8 were 3.1 (2.0 to 4.7), 1.9 (1.3 to 2.9), and 1.00, respectively. The Framingham Risk Score–adjusted mortality risk decreased by 17% for every 1-MET increase. Conclusions— This is the largest cohort of asymptomatic women studied in this context over the longest period of follow-up. This study confirms that exercise capacity is an independent predictor of death in asymptomatic women, greater than what has been previously established among men. The implications for clinical practice and health care policy are far reaching.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000091080.57509.e9

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1161/circ.98.25.2836 · DOI
  2. 1992, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 24, S201
  3. 1988, Circulation, 77, 501A
  4. 10.1161/circ.97.18.1837 · DOI
  5. 10.1161/circ.74.4.3757179 · DOI
  6. American College of Sports Medicine. ACMS’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Baltimore Md: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000: 368.
  7. 10.1161/circ.83.1.1984895 · DOI
  8. 10.1161/circ.98.16.1622 · DOI
  9. 2001, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 33, 762
  10. 10.1161/circ.100.17.1764 · DOI
  11. 10.1161/circ.104.14.1694 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 739

Metadata

Authors
Gulati, M., Pandey, D. K., Arnsdorf, M. F., Lauderdale, D. S., Thisted, R. A., Wicklund, R. H., Al-Hani, A. J., & Black, H. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • From the Department of Preventive Medicine (M.G., D.K.P., H.R.B.) and Department of Medicine (M.G.), Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke’s Medical Center, Chicago, Ill; Division of Cardiology (M.F.A.) and Department of Health Studies (D.S.L., R.A.T.), University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill; and Division of Cardiology (R.H.W., A.J.A-H.), St James Hospital, Chicago Heights, Ill.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2003-09-30
Volume
108
Issue
13
Pages
1554-1559
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2055869123
Cited by
739
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 37
FWCI
60.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Keywords
exercise capacity, cardiovascular mortality, women, asymptomatic women, physical fitness, metabolic equivalents, exercise stress testing, Bruce protocol, Framingham risk score, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Exercise Test, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Mortality, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Survival Rate, Exercise Tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review