Cited by 1,274Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthSports Performance and Training

High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Weston, Kassia S, Wisløff, Ulrik, Coombes, Jeff S·2014·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background/Aim: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a strong determinant of morbidity and mortality. In athletes and the general population, it is established that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in improving CRF. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the efficacy and safety of HIIT compared to MICT in individuals with chronic cardiometabolic lifestyle diseases. Methods: The included studies were required to have a population sample of chronic disease, where poor lifestyle is considered as a main contributor to the disease. The procedural quality of the studies was assessed by use of a modified Physiotherapy Evidence Base Database (PEDro) scale. A meta-analysis compared the mean difference (MD) of preintervention versus postintervention CRF (VO 2 peak) between HIIT and MICT. Results: 10 studies with 273 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Participants had coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, metabolic syndrome and obesity. There was a significantly higher increase in the VO 2 peak after HIIT compared to MICT (MD 3.03 mL/kg/min, 95% CI 2.00 to 4.07), equivalent to 9.1%. Conclusions: HIIT significantly increases CRF by almost double that of MICT in patients with lifestyle-induced chronic diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092576

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The small number of studies synthesized and the specificity of the target populations in prior systematic reviews hinder the generalizability of results to a broader population of individuals who are insufficiently active or present with varying medical conditions.

    “The small number of studies synthesized and the specificity of the target populations in these systematic reviews hinder the generalizability of results to a broader population of individuals who are insufficiently active or present with varying medical conditions.”

    From Rates of compliance and adherence to high-intensity interval training: a systematic review and Meta-analyses (2023) · cites this paper as [14]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Weston and colleagues reported attendance rates greater than 85% for six studies focusing on individuals with cardiometabolic disease.

    “Weston and colleagues [14] reporting attendance rates > 85% for six studies focusing on individuals with cardiometabolic disease”
  • Both HIIT and MICT exercise modalities have been shown to elicit positive physiological benefits.

    “Given that both exercise modalities have been shown to elicit positive physiological benefits [14–18]”
  • A meta-analysis comparing psychological responses to HIIT versus MICT supports the notion that individual responses vary, with many older adults experiencing greater psychological benefits from HIIT.

    “Additionally, a meta-analysis comparing psychological responses to HIIT versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) supports the notion that individual responses vary, with many older adults experiencing greater psychological benefits from HIIT [183].”
  • A meta-analysis comparing psychological responses to HIIT versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) supports the notion that individual responses vary, with many older adults experiencing greater psychological benefits from HIIT.

    “Additionally, a meta-analysis comparing psychological responses to HIIT versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) supports the notion that individual responses vary, with many older adults experiencing greater psychological benefits from HIIT [183].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bouchard C, An P, Rice T, et al. Familial aggregation of VO 2max response to exercise training: results from the HERITAGE Family Study. J Appl Physiol 1999;87:1003-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weston, K. S., Wisløff, U., & Coombes, J. S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Coombes, Jeff S
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-10-21
Volume
48
Issue
16
Pages
1227-1234
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2166758089
Cited by
1,274
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 131 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 128 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 2
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
high-intensity interval training, moderate-intensity continuous training, cardiorespiratory fitness, peak oxygen uptake, cardiometabolic disease, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, obesity, exercise safety
MeSH terms
Cardiac Rehabilitation, Antioxidants, Chronic Disease, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Life Style, Metabolic Diseases, Oxygen Consumption, Patient Compliance, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review