Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 554

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Infarct Remodeling After Intracoronary Progenitor Cell Treatment in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction (TOPCARE-AMI): Mechanistic Insights From Serial Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Open access
Britten, M.B., Abolmaali, N.D., Assmus, B., Lehmann, R., Honold, J., Schmitt, J., Vogl, T.J., Martin, H., Schächinger, V., Dimmeler, S., Zeiher, A.M.·2003·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Experimental and initial clinical studies suggest that transplantation of circulating blood– (CPC) or bone marrow–derived (BMC) progenitor cells may beneficially affect postinfarction remodeling processes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). To relate functional characteristics of the infused cells to quantitative measures of outcome at 4-month follow-up, we performed serial contrast-enhanced MRI and assessed the migratory capacity of the transplanted progenitor cells immediately before intracoronary infusion. Methods and Results— In 28 patients with reperfused AMI receiving either BMCs or CPCs into the infarct artery 4.7±1.7 days after AMI, serial contrast-enhanced MRI performed initially and after 4 months revealed a significant increase in global ejection fraction (from 44±10% to 49±10%; P =0.003), a decrease in end-systolic volume (from 69±26 to 60±28 mL; P =0.003), and unchanged end-diastolic volumes (122±34 versus 117±37 mL; P =NS). Infarct size, measured as late enhancement (LE) volume, decreased significantly, from 46±32 to 37±28 mL ( P <0.05). There was a significant correlation between the reduction in LE volume and global ejection fraction improvement. The migratory capacity of transplanted cells as assessed ex vivo toward a gradient of vascular endothelial growth factor for CPCs and stromal cell derived factor-1 for BMCs was closely correlated with the reduction of LE volume. By multivariate analysis, migratory capacity remained the most important independent predictor of infarct remodeling. Conclusions— Analysis of serial contrast-enhanced MRI suggests that intracoronary infusion of adult progenitor cells in patients with AMI beneficially affects postinfarction remodeling processes. The migratory capacity of the infused cells is a major determinant of infarct remodeling, disclosing a causal effect of progenitor cell therapy on regeneration enhancement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000095788.78169.af

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 554

Metadata

Authors
Britten, M. B., Abolmaali, N. D., Assmus, B., Lehmann, R., Honold, J., Schmitt, J., Vogl, T. J., Martin, H., Schächinger, V., Dimmeler, S., & Zeiher, A. M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2003-11-04
Volume
108
Issue
18
Pages
2212-2218
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2108285596
Cited by
554
References
0
FWCI
26.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infarct Remodeling After Intracoronary Progenitor Cell Treatment in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction (TOPCARE-AMI): Mechanistic Insights From Serial Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000095788.78169.af
The paper
Britten, M. B., Abolmaali, N. D., Assmus, B., Lehmann, R., Honold, J., Schmitt, J., Vogl, T. J., Martin, H., Schächinger, V., Dimmeler, S., & Zeiher, A. M. (2003). Infarct Remodeling After Intracoronary Progenitor Cell Treatment in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction (TOPCARE-AMI): Mechanistic Insights From Serial Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000095788.78169.af

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.