The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hyperventilation-Induced Hypotension During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Open accessAbstract
Background— A clinical observational study revealed that rescuers consistently hyperventilated patients during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The objective of this study was to quantify the degree of excessive ventilation in humans and determine if comparable excessive ventilation rates during CPR in animals significantly decrease coronary perfusion pressure and survival. Methods and Results— In humans, ventilation rate and duration during CPR was electronically recorded by professional rescuers. In 13 consecutive adults (average age, 63±5.8 years) receiving CPR (7 men), average ventilation rate was 30±3.2 per minute (range, 15 to 49). Average duration per breath was 1.0±0.07 per second. No patient survived. Hemodynamics were studied in 9 pigs in cardiac arrest ventilated in random order with 12, 20, or 30 breaths per minute. Survival rates were then studied in 3 groups of 7 pigs in cardiac arrest that were ventilated at 12 breaths per minute (100% O 2 ), 30 breaths per minute (100% O 2 ), or 30 breaths per minute (5% CO 2 /95% O 2 ). In animals treated with 12, 20, and 30 breaths per minute, the mean intrathoracic pressure (mm Hg/min) and coronary perfusion pressure (mm Hg) were 7.1±0.7, 11.6±0.7, 17.5±1.0 ( P <0.0001), and 23.4±1.0, 19.5±1.8, and 16.9±1.8 ( P =0.03), respectively. Survival rates were 6/7, 1/7, and 1/7 with 12, 30, and 30+ CO 2 breaths per minute, respectively ( P =0.006). Conclusions— Professional rescuers were observed to excessively ventilate patients during out-of-hospital CPR. Subsequent animal studies demonstrated that similar excessive ventilation rates resulted in significantly increased intrathoracic pressure and markedly decreased coronary perfusion pressures and survival rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kleinman, M. E., de Caen, A. R., Chameides, L., Atkins, D. L., Berg, R. A., Berg, M. D., Bhanji, F., Biarent, D., Bingham, R., Coovadia, A. H., et al. (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2972a · Cited by 86
Chai, P. J., Jacobs, J. P., Dalton, H. J., Costello, J. M., Cooper, D. S., Kirsch, R., Rosenthal, T., Graziano, J. N., & Quintessenza, J. A. (2011) · Cardiology in the Young · doi:10.1017/s1047951111001685 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Aufderheide, T. P., Sigurdsson, G., Pirrallo, R. G., Yannopoulos, D., McKnite, S., von Briesen, C., Sparks, C. W., Conrad, C. J., Provo, T. A., & Lurie, K. G.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2004-04-27
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1960-1965
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2120831964
- Cited by
- 886
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 67.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperventilation-Induced Hypotension During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000126594.79136.61
- The paper
- Aufderheide, T. P., Sigurdsson, G., Pirrallo, R. G., Yannopoulos, D., McKnite, S., von Briesen, C., Sparks, C. W., Conrad, C. J., Provo, T. A., & Lurie, K. G. (2004). Hyperventilation-Induced Hypotension During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000126594.79136.61
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.