The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Value of Delayed-Enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Myocardial Viability After Surgical Revascularization
Open accessAbstract
Background— Despite the accepted utility of delayed-enhancement MRI in identifying irreversible myocardial injury, no study has yet assessed its role as a viability tool exclusively in the setting of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), and no study has repeated delayed-enhancement MRI late after revascularization. In a clinical trial in which patients underwent CABG by either the off-pump or on-pump surgical technique, we hypothesized that (1) preoperative delayed-enhancement MRI would have high diagnostic accuracy in predicting viability and (2) the occurrence of perioperative myocardial necrosis would affect late regional wall motion recovery. Methods and Results— Fifty-two patients undergoing multivessel CABG were studied by preoperative and early (day 6) and late (6 months) postoperative cine MRI for global and regional functional assessment and delayed-enhancement MRI for assessment of irreversible myocardial injury. Preoperatively, 611 segments (21%) had abnormal regional function, whereas 421 segments (14%) showed evidence of hyperenhancement. At 6 months after revascularization, 57% (343 of 611) of dysfunctional segments improved contraction by at least 1 grade. When all preoperative dysfunctional segments were analyzed, there was a strong correlation between the transmural extent of hyperenhancement and the recovery in regional function at 6 months ( P <0.001). Of a total of 96 previously dysfunctional but nonenhancing or minimally hyperenhancing myocardial segments that did not improve regional function at 6 months, 35 (36%) demonstrated new perioperative hyperenhancement in the early postoperative MRI scan. Conclusions— Delayed-enhancement MRI is a powerful predictor of myocardial viability after surgery, suggesting an important role for this technique in clinical viability assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stunning, Hibernation, and Assessment of Myocardial Viability
Camici, P. G., Prasad, S. K., & Rimoldi, O. E. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.702993 · Cited by 409
Dall'Armellina, E., Piechnik, S. K., Ferreira, V. M., Si, Q. L., Robson, M. D., Francis, J. M., Cuculi, F., Kharbanda, R. K., Banning, A. P., Choudhury, R. P., et al. (2012) · Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1186/1532-429x-14-15 · Cited by 285
Self-citationDall'Armellina, E., Karia, N., Lindsay, A. C., Karamitsos, T. D., Ferreira, V., Robson, M. D., Kellman, P., Francis, J. M., Forfar, C., Prendergast, B. D., et al. (2011) · Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1161/circimaging.111.963421 · Cited by 256
Self-citationBerg, J., Kottwitz, J., Baltensperger, N., Kissel, C. K., Lovrinovic, M., Mehra, T., Scherff, F., Schmied, C., Templin, C., Lüscher, T. F., et al. (2017) · Circulation: Heart Failure · doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.117.004262 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Selvanayagam, J. B., Kardos, A., Francis, J. M., Wiesmann, F., Petersen, S. E., Taggart, D. P., & Neubauer, S.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2004-09-21
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1535-1541
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2116456639
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Value of Delayed-Enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Myocardial Viability After Surgical Revascularization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000142045.22628.74
- The paper
- Selvanayagam, J. B., Kardos, A., Francis, J. M., Wiesmann, F., Petersen, S. E., Taggart, D. P., & Neubauer, S. (2004). Value of Delayed-Enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Myocardial Viability After Surgical Revascularization. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000142045.22628.74
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.