Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic Impact of Plasma N-Terminal Pro–Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Severe Chronic Congestive Heart Failure: A Substudy of the Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival (COPERNICUS) Trial

Open access
Hartmann, Franz, Packer, Milton, Coats, Andrew J.S., Fowler, Michael B., Krum, Henry, Mohacsi, Paul, Rouleau, Jean L., Tendera, Michal, Castaigne, Alain, Anker, Stefan D., Amann-Zalan, Ildiko, Hoersch, Silke, Katus, Hugo A.·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— The utility of N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) to predict the occurrence of death and hospitalization was prospectively evaluated in the COPERNICUS study, which enrolled patients with an ejection fraction <25% and symptoms of chronic congestive heart failure at rest or on minimal exertion. Methods and Results— Baseline plasma concentrations of NT-proBNP were measured in a subgroup of 814 men and 197 women with symptoms at rest or on minimal exertion who were enrolled in the COPERNICUS study and were randomized to placebo (n=506) or carvedilol (n=505). Values of NT-proBNP were markedly increased despite the requirement that patients be euvolemic before the start of treatment (mean±SD, 3235±4392 pg/mL; median, 1767 pg/mL). By univariate Cox regression analysis, NT-proBNP was found to be a powerful predictor of subsequent all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR], 2.7; 95% CI, 1.7 to 4.3; P =0.0001 for above versus below median) and all-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failure (RR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.8 to 3.4; P =0.0001 for above versus below median). The predictive value of NT-proBNP was similar when both placebo and carvedilol patients were analyzed separately. No significant interaction was found between NT-proBNP and treatment group ( P =0.93 for above- versus below-median NT-proBNP). Conclusions— NT-proBNP was consistently associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality and for all-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failure in patients with severe congestive heart failure, even in those who were clinically euvolemic. This marker therefore may be a useful tool in risk stratification of patients with severe congestive heart failure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000143059.68996.a7

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Hartmann, F., Packer, M., Coats, A. J. S., Fowler, M. B., Krum, H., Mohacsi, P., Rouleau, J. L., Tendera, M., Castaigne, A., Anker, S. D., Amann-Zalan, I., Hoersch, S., & Katus, H. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-09-28
Volume
110
Issue
13
Pages
1780-1786
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2004779219
Cited by
301
References
18
FWCI
11.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Impact of Plasma N-Terminal Pro–Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Severe Chronic Congestive Heart Failure: A Substudy of the Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival (COPERNICUS) Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000143059.68996.a7
The paper
Hartmann, F., Packer, M., Coats, A. J. S., Fowler, M. B., Krum, H., Mohacsi, P., Rouleau, J. L., Tendera, M., Castaigne, A., Anker, S. D., Amann-Zalan, I., Hoersch, S., & Katus, H. A. (2004). Prognostic Impact of Plasma N-Terminal Pro–Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Severe Chronic Congestive Heart Failure: A Substudy of the Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival (COPERNICUS) Trial. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000143059.68996.a7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.