Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 700

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide as an Indicator of Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Long-term Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Comparison With Plasma Atrial Natriuretic Peptide and N-Terminal Proatrial Natriuretic Peptide

Omland, Torbjørn, Aakvaag, Asbjørn, Bonarjee, Vernon V. S., Caidahl, Kenneth, Lie, Rolv Terje, Nilsen, Dennis W. T., Sundsfjord, Johan A., Dickstein, Kenneth·1996·Circulation

Abstract

Background Elevated plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and the N-terminal fragment of the ANP prohormone (N-ANP) are associated with decreased left ventricular function and decreased long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Previous data suggest that plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) may increase proportionally more than plasma ANP after AMI and in chronic heart failure. The diagnostic and prognostic value of plasma BNP as an indicator of left ventricular dysfunction and long-term survival after AMI, relative to that of ANP and N-ANP, remain to be established. Methods and Results Venous blood samples for analysis of ANP, N-ANP, and BNP were obtained on day 3 after symptom onset from 131 patients with documented AMI. Left ventricular ejection fraction was determined by echocardiography in a subsample of 79 patients. Twenty-eight cardiovascular and 3 noncardiovascular deaths occurred during the follow-up period (median, 1293 days). All three peptides proved to be powerful predictors of cardiovascular mortality by univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses (ANP: P <.0001; N-ANP: P =.0002; BNP: P <.0001). In a multivariate model, plasma BNP ( P =.021) but not ANP ( P =.638) or N-ANP ( P =.782) provided additional prognostic information beyond left ventricular ejection fraction. Logistic regression analysis showed that ANP ( P =.003) and N-ANP ( P =.027) but not BNP ( P =.14) were significantly associated with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45%. Conclusions These results suggest that plasma BNP determination provides important, independent prognostic information after AMI. Although plasma ANP appears to be a better predictor of left ventricular dysfunction, plasma BNP may have greater potential to complement standard prognostic indicators used in risk stratification after AMI because of its strong, independent association with long-term survival, enhanced in vitro stability, and simplicity of analysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.93.11.1963

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 700

Metadata

Authors
Omland, T., Aakvaag, A., Bonarjee, V. V. S., Caidahl, K., Lie, R. T., Nilsen, D. W. T., Sundsfjord, J. A., & Dickstein, K.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1996-06
Volume
93
Issue
11
Pages
1963-1969
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1989447605
Cited by
700
References
1
FWCI
17.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide as an Indicator of Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Long-term Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Comparison With Plasma Atrial Natriuretic Peptide and N-Terminal Proatrial Natriuretic Peptide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.93.11.1963
The paper
Omland, T., Aakvaag, A., Bonarjee, V. V. S., Caidahl, K., Lie, R. T., Nilsen, D. W. T., Sundsfjord, J. A., & Dickstein, K. (1996). Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide as an Indicator of Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Long-term Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Comparison With Plasma Atrial Natriuretic Peptide and N-Terminal Proatrial Natriuretic Peptide. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.93.11.1963

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.