Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ambient Pollution and Blood Pressure in Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients

Open access
Zanobetti, Antonella, Canner, Marina Jacobson, Stone, Peter H., Schwartz, Joel, Sher, David, Eagan-Bengston, Elizabeth, Gates, Karen A., Hartley, L. Howard, Suh, Helen, Gold, Diane R.·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Multiple studies have demonstrated a consistent association between ambient particulate air pollution and increased risk of hospital admissions and deaths for cardiovascular causes. We investigated the associations between fine particulate pollution (PM 2.5 ) and blood pressure during 631 repeated visits for cardiac rehabilitation in 62 Boston residents with cardiovascular disease. Methods and Results— Blood pressure, cardiac risk factor, and exercise data were abstracted from records of rehabilitation visits between 1999 and 2001. We applied mixed-effect models, controlling for body mass index, age, gender, number of visits, hour of day, and weather variables. For an increase from the 10th to the 90th percentile in mean PM 2.5 level during the 5 days before the visit (10.5 μg/m 3 ), there was a 2.8-mm Hg (95% CI, 0.1 to 5.5) increase in resting systolic, a 2.7-mm Hg (95% CI, 1.2 to 4.3) increase in resting diastolic, and a 2.7-mm Hg (95% CI, 1.0 to 4.5) increase in resting mean arterial blood pressure. The mean PM 2.5 level during the 2 preceding days (13.9 μg/m 3 ) was associated with a 7.0-mm Hg (95% CI, 2.3 to 12.1) increase in diastolic and a 4.7-mm Hg (95% CI, 0.5 to 9.1) increase in mean arterial blood pressure during exercise in persons with resting heart rate ≥70 bpm, but it was not associated with an increase in blood pressure during exercise in persons with heart rate <70 bpm. Conclusions— In patients with preexisting cardiac disease, particle pollution may contribute to increased risk of cardiac morbidity and mortality through short-term increases in systemic arterial vascular narrowing, as manifested by increased peripheral blood pressure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000143831.33243.d8

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Zanobetti, A., Canner, M. J., Stone, P. H., Schwartz, J., Sher, D., Eagan-Bengston, E., Gates, K. A., Hartley, L. H., Suh, H., & Gold, D. R.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-10-12
Volume
110
Issue
15
Pages
2184-2189
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2085444785
Cited by
265
References
4
FWCI
10.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ambient Pollution and Blood Pressure in Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000143831.33243.d8
The paper
Zanobetti, A., Canner, M. J., Stone, P. H., Schwartz, J., Sher, D., Eagan-Bengston, E., Gates, K. A., Hartley, L. H., Suh, H., & Gold, D. R. (2004). Ambient Pollution and Blood Pressure in Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000143831.33243.d8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.