Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 410

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Correlations Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients With an Ambiguous Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis

Open access
Jasti, Venu, Ivan, Eugen, Yalamanchili, Venkata, Wongpraparut, Nattawut, Leesar, Massoud A.·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is being used to assess the significance of a left main coronary artery stenosis (LMCS). However, the cutoff values of IVUS parameters at which to predict a fractional flow reserve (FFR) of 0.75 are unknown. Methods and Results— In 55 patients with an angiographically ambiguous LMCS, a pressure guidewire was used to calculate FFR, and IVUS parameters were calculated after automatic pullback. FFR averaged 0.86±0.13 (range, 0.55 to 1.0). IVUS minimum lumen diameter (MLD), minimum lumen area (MLA), cross-sectional narrowing (CSN), and area stenosis (AS) were 3.8±0.61 mm, 7.65±2.9 mm 2 , 59±13%, and 47±19%, respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated strong correlations between FFR and MLD ( r =0.79, P <0.0001) as well as between FFR and MLA ( r =0.74, P <0.0001). There were inverse, moderate correlations between FFR and CSN ( r =0.69, P <0.0001), followed by those between FFR and AS ( r =0.54, P <0.0001). Compared with FFR as the “gold standard,” an MLD of 2.8 mm had the highest sensitivity and specificity (93% and 98%, respectively) for determining the significance of an LMCS, followed by an MLA of 5.9 mm 2 (93% and 95%, respectively). Based on an FFR <0.75 and an FFR ≥0.75, the 38-month survival and event-free survival estimates (EFSEs) were both 100% and 100% versus 90%, respectively ( P =NS). Conclusions— We conclude that (1) an IVUS MLD and MLA of 2.8 mm and 5.9 mm 2 , respectively, strongly predict the physiological significance of an LMCS and (2) among patients with an LMCS, an FFR of 0.75 is a strong predictor of survival and EFSE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000146338.62813.e7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 410

Metadata

Authors
Jasti, V., Ivan, E., Yalamanchili, V., Wongpraparut, N., & Leesar, M. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-11-02
Volume
110
Issue
18
Pages
2831-2836
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2150380245
Cited by
410
References
0
FWCI
11.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlations Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients With an Ambiguous Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000146338.62813.e7
The paper
Jasti, V., Ivan, E., Yalamanchili, V., Wongpraparut, N., & Leesar, M. A. (2004). Correlations Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients With an Ambiguous Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000146338.62813.e7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.