Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions

Johnson, Thomas W, Räber, Lorenz, di Mario, Carlo, Bourantas, Christos, Jia, Haibo, Mattesini, Alessio, Gonzalo, Nieves, de la Torre Hernandez, Jose M, Prati, Francesco, Koskinas, Konstantinos, Joner, Michael, Radu, Maria D, Erlinge, David, Regar, Evelyn, Kunadian, Vijay, Maehara, Akiko, Byrne, Robert A, Capodanno, Davide, Akasaka, Takashi, Wijns, William, Mintz, Gary S, Guagliumi, Giulio·2019·European Heart Journal

Abstract

This consensus document is the second of two reports summarizing the views of an expert panel organized by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) on the clinical use of intracoronary imaging including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-IVUS. Beyond guidance of stent selection and optimization of deployment, invasive imaging facilitates angiographic interpretation and may guide treatment in acute coronary syndrome. Intravascular imaging can provide additional important diagnostic information when confronted with angiographically ambiguous lesions and allows assessment of plaque morphology enabling identification of vulnerability characteristics. This second document focuses on useful imaging features to identify culprit and vulnerable coronary plaque, which offers the interventional cardiologist guidance on when to adopt an intracoronary imaging-guided approach to the treatment of coronary artery disease and provides an appraisal of intravascular imaging-derived metrics to define the haemodynamic significance of coronary lesions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz332

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 76 references

Cited by

See all 305

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, T. W., Räber, L., di Mario, C., Bourantas, C., Jia, H., Mattesini, A., Gonzalo, N., de la Torre Hernandez, J. M., Prati, F., Koskinas, K., Joner, M., Radu, M. D., Erlinge, D., Regar, E., Kunadian, V., Maehara, A., Byrne, R. A., Capodanno, D., Akasaka, T., Wijns, W., Mintz, G. S., & Guagliumi, G.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2019-05-21
Volume
40
Issue
31
Pages
2566-2584
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2993079344
Cited by
305
References
76
FWCI
33.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz332
The paper
Johnson, T. W., Räber, L., di Mario, C., Bourantas, C., Jia, H., Mattesini, A., Gonzalo, N., de la Torre Hernandez, J. M., Prati, F., Koskinas, K., Joner, M., Radu, M. D., Erlinge, D., Regar, E., Kunadian, V., Maehara, A., Byrne, R. A., Capodanno, D., Akasaka, T., . . . Guagliumi, G. (2019). Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz332

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.