Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 491

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Detrimental Ventricular Remodeling in Patients With Congenital Complete Heart Block and Chronic Right Ventricular Apical Pacing

Thambo, Jean-Benoît, Bordachar, Pierre, Garrigue, Stephane, Lafitte, Stephane, Sanders, Prashanthan, Reuter, Sylvain, Girardot, Romain, Crepin, David, Reant, Patricia, Roudaut, Raymond, Jaïs, Pierre, Haïssaguerre, Michel, Clementy, Jacques, Jimenez, Maria·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Although dual-chamber pacing improves cardiac function in patients with complete congenital atrioventricular block (CCAVB) by restoring physiological heart rate and atrioventricular synchronization, the long-term detrimental effect of asynchronous electromechanical activation induced by apical right ventricular pacing (RVP) has not been well clarified. Methods and Results— Twenty-three CCAVB adults (24±3 years) with a DDD transvenous pacemaker underwent conventional echocardiography before implantation and, after at least 5 years of RVP, an exercise test and echocardiography coupled with tissue Doppler imaging and tissue tracking. They were compared with 30 matched healthy control subjects. After 10±3 years of RVP, CCAVB adults had significantly higher values versus controls in terms of intra-left ventricular (LV) asynchrony (respectively, 59±18 versus 19±9 ms, P <0.001), extent of LV myocardium displaying delayed longitudinal contraction (39±15% versus 10±7%, P <0.01), and septal-to-posterior wall-motion delay (84±26 versus 18±9 ms, P <0.01). The ratio of late-activated posterior to early-activated septal wall thickness was higher after long-term RVP than before (1.3±0.2 vs 1±0.1, P =0.05) and was higher than in controls (1±0.1, P <0.05). The percentage of patients with increased LV end-diastolic diameter was higher after long-term RVP than before implantation and was higher than in controls (57% versus 13%, P <0.05, and 57% versus 0%, P <0.01, respectively). CCAVB patients with long-term RVP had a lower cardiac output than controls (3.8±0.6 versus 4.9±0.8 L/min, P <0.05) and lower exercise performance (123±24 versus 185±39 W, P <0.001). Conclusions— Prolonged ventricular dyssynchrony induced by long-term endovenous RVP is associated with deleterious LV remodeling, LV dilatation, LV asymmetrical hypertrophy, and low exercise capacity. These new data highlight the importance of the ventricular activation sequence in all patients with chronic ventricular pacing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000150336.86033.8d

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 491

Metadata

Authors
Thambo, J.-B., Bordachar, P., Garrigue, S., Lafitte, S., Sanders, P., Reuter, S., Girardot, R., Crepin, D., Reant, P., Roudaut, R., Jaïs, P., Haïssaguerre, M., Clementy, J., & Jimenez, M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-12-21
Volume
110
Issue
25
Pages
3766-3772
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2140577675
Cited by
491
References
0
FWCI
16.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detrimental Ventricular Remodeling in Patients With Congenital Complete Heart Block and Chronic Right Ventricular Apical Pacing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000150336.86033.8d
The paper
Thambo, J.-B., Bordachar, P., Garrigue, S., Lafitte, S., Sanders, P., Reuter, S., Girardot, R., Crepin, D., Reant, P., Roudaut, R., Jaïs, P., Haïssaguerre, M., Clementy, J., & Jimenez, M. (2004). Detrimental Ventricular Remodeling in Patients With Congenital Complete Heart Block and Chronic Right Ventricular Apical Pacing. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000150336.86033.8d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.