Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biventricular Versus Conventional Right Ventricular Stimulation for Patients With Standard Pacing Indication and Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Open access
Kindermann, Michael, Hennen, Benno, Jung, Jens, Geisel, Jürgen, Böhm, Michael, Fröhlig, Gerd·2006·Journal of the American College of Cardiology
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.056
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.056

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Kang, 2004, Systolic and diastolic regional myocardial motion of pacing-induced versus idiopathic left bundle branch block with and without left ventricular dysfunction, Am J Cardiol, 93, 1243, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.068 · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.068
  2. Mizutani, 2004, Comparative study of the effect of pacing mode on the interaction of the right and left ventricles, J Artif Organs, 7, 77, 10.1007/s10047-004-0250-3 · doi:10.1007/s10047-004-0250-3
  3. Kindermann, 1997, Optimizing the AV delay in DDD pacemaker patients with high degree AV block, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 20, 2453, 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb06085.x · doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb06085.x
  4. Tei, 1995, New index of combined systolic and diastolic myocardial performance, J Cardiol, 26, 357
  5. Lesniak-Sobelga, 2004, Vena contracta width as a simple method of assessing mitral valve regurgitation, J Heart Valve Dis, 13, 608
  6. Bargiggia, 1989, A new method for estimating left ventricular dP/dt by continuous wave Doppler-echocardiography, Circulation, 80, 1287, 10.1161/01.CIR.80.5.1287 · doi:10.1161/01.cir.80.5.1287
  7. Nishimura, 1995, Mechanism of hemodynamic improvement by dual-chamber pacing for severe left ventricular dysfunction, J Am Coll Cardiol, 25, 281, 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00419-Q · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(94)00419-q
  8. Schwaab, 2001, Septal lead implantation for the reduction of paced QRS duration using passive-fixation leads, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 24, 28, 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00028.x · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00028.x
  9. Garrigue, 2003, Comparison of permanent left ventricular and biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation, Card Electrophysiol Rev, 7, 315, 10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023167.11038.8f · doi:10.1023/b:cepr.0000023167.11038.8f
  10. Tanabe, 1990, The effects of pacing-induced left bundle branch block on left ventricular systolic and diastolic performances, Jpn Heart J, 31, 309, 10.1536/ihj.31.309 · doi:10.1536/ihj.31.309
  11. Xiao, 1993, Differing effects of right ventricular pacing and left bundle branch block on left ventricular function, Br Heart J, 69, 166, 10.1136/hrt.69.2.166 · doi:10.1136/hrt.69.2.166

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
Kindermann, M., Hennen, B., Jung, J., Geisel, J., Böhm, M., & Fröhlig, G.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
47
Issue
10
Pages
1927-1937
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.056
OpenAlex
W120646713
Cited by
278
References
36
FWCI
19.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biventricular Versus Conventional Right Ventricular Stimulation for Patients With Standard Pacing Indication and Left Ventricular Dysfunction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.056
The paper
Kindermann, M., Hennen, B., Jung, J., Geisel, J., Böhm, M., & Fröhlig, G. (2006). Biventricular Versus Conventional Right Ventricular Stimulation for Patients With Standard Pacing Indication and Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.056

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.