Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 982

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Amyloidosis

Maceira, Alicia Maria, Joshi, Jayshree, Prasad, Sanjay Kumar, Moon, James Charles, Perugini, Enrica, Harding, Idris, Sheppard, Mary Noelle, Poole-Wilson, Philip Alexander, Hawkins, Philip Nigel, Pennell, Dudley John·2005·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Cardiac amyloidosis can be diagnostically challenging. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can assess abnormal myocardial interstitium. Methods and Results— Late gadolinium enhancement CMR was performed in 30 patients with cardiac amyloidosis. In 22 of these, myocardial gadolinium kinetics with T 1 mapping was compared with that in 16 hypertensive controls. One patient had CMR and autopsy only. Subendocardial T 1 in amyloid patients was shorter than in controls (at 4 minutes: 427±73 versus 579±75 ms; P <0.01), was shorter than subepicardium T 1 for the first 8 minutes ( P ≤0.01), and was correlated with markers of increased myocardial amyloid load, as follows: left ventricular (LV) mass ( r =−0.51, P =0.013); wall thickness ( r =−0.54 to −0.63, P <0.04); interatrial septal thickness ( r =−0.52, P =0.001); and diastolic function ( r =−0.42, P =0.025). Global subendocardial late gadolinium enhancement was found in 20 amyloid patients (69%); these patients had greater LV mass (126±30 versus 93±25 g/m 2 ; P =0.009) than unenhanced patients. Histological quantification showed substantial interstitial expansion with amyloid (30.5%) but only minor fibrosis (1.3%). Amyloid was dominantly subendocardial (42%) compared with midwall (29%) and subepicardium (18%). There was 97% concordance in diagnosis of cardiac amyloid by combining the presence of late gadolinium enhancement and an optimized T 1 threshold (191 ms at 4 minutes) between myocardium and blood. Conclusions— In cardiac amyloidosis, CMR shows a characteristic pattern of global subendocardial late enhancement coupled with abnormal myocardial and blood-pool gadolinium kinetics. The findings agree with the transmural histological distribution of amyloid protein and the cardiac amyloid load and may prove to have value in diagnosis and treatment follow-up.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000152819.97857.9d

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 982

Metadata

Authors
Maceira, A. M., Joshi, J., Prasad, S. K., Moon, J. C., Perugini, E., Harding, I., Sheppard, M. N., Poole-Wilson, P. A., Hawkins, P. N., & Pennell, D. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2005-01-18
Volume
111
Issue
2
Pages
186-193
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2101817311
Cited by
982
References
1
FWCI
14.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Amyloidosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000152819.97857.9d
The paper
Maceira, A. M., Joshi, J., Prasad, S. K., Moon, J. C., Perugini, E., Harding, I., Sheppard, M. N., Poole-Wilson, P. A., Hawkins, P. N., & Pennell, D. J. (2005). Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Amyloidosis. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000152819.97857.9d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.