Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 449

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-Term Prognosis of Individuals With Right Precordial ST-Segment–Elevation Brugada Syndrome

Open access
Eckardt, Lars, Probst, Vincent, Smits, Jeroen P.P., Bahr, Eric Schulze, Wolpert, Christian, Schimpf, Rainer, Wichter, Thomas, Boisseau, Pierre, Heinecke, Achim, Breithardt, Günter, Borggrefe, Martin, LeMarec, Herve, Böcker, Dirk, Wilde, Arthur A.M.·2005·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Brugada syndrome is an arrhythmogenic disease characterized by an ECG pattern of ST-segment elevation in the right precordial leads and an increased risk of sudden cardiac death as a result of ventricular fibrillation. Controversy exists with regard to risk stratification and therapeutic management, particularly in asymptomatic individuals. Methods and Results— A total of 212 individuals (mean age, 45±6 years) with a type 1 Brugada ECG pattern were studied. Of these, 123 (58%) were asymptomatic, 65 (31%) had ≥1 syncope of unknown origin, and 24 (11%) had to be resuscitated because of ventricular fibrillation. In 125 individuals (59%), a spontaneous type 1 ECG was recorded. In the remaining, drug challenge with a class I antiarrhythmic agent unmasked a Brugada ECG. The mean ST elevation was 2.3±1.2 mm in symptomatic patients and 1.9±1.5 mm in asymptomatic individuals ( P =0.04). During a mean follow-up of 40±50 months, 4 of the 24 patients (17%) with aborted sudden cardiac death and 4 of 65 (6%) with a prior syncope had a recurrent arrhythmic event, whereas only 1 of 123 asymptomatic individuals (0.8%) had a first arrhythmic event. Four of 9 patients with arrhythmic events during follow-up were not inducible during programmed electrical stimulation. A previous history of aborted sudden death or syncope and the presence of a spontaneous type 1 ECG were predictors of adverse outcome. Conclusions— The present study reports data on a large population of individuals with a type 1 Brugada ECG pattern with the longest follow-up reported so far. A very low incidence of severe arrhythmic events, particularly in asymptomatic individuals, was found during follow-up. In the presence of very few arrhythmic events on follow-up, programmed electrical stimulation showed very little accuracy in predicting outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000153267.21278.8d

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 449

Metadata

Authors
Eckardt, L., Probst, V., Smits, J. P. P., Bahr, E. S., Wolpert, C., Schimpf, R., Wichter, T., Boisseau, P., Heinecke, A., Breithardt, G., Borggrefe, M., LeMarec, H., Böcker, D., & Wilde, A. A. M.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2005-01-25
Volume
111
Issue
3
Pages
257-263
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2109222119
Cited by
449
References
1
FWCI
28.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Prognosis of Individuals With Right Precordial ST-Segment–Elevation Brugada Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000153267.21278.8d
The paper
Eckardt, L., Probst, V., Smits, J. P. P., Bahr, E. S., Wolpert, C., Schimpf, R., Wichter, T., Boisseau, P., Heinecke, A., Breithardt, G., Borggrefe, M., LeMarec, H., Böcker, D., & Wilde, A. A. M. (2005). Long-Term Prognosis of Individuals With Right Precordial ST-Segment–Elevation Brugada Syndrome. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000153267.21278.8d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.