Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 896

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Vivo Characterization of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque by Use of Optical Coherence Tomography

Open access
Jang, Ik-Kyung, Tearney, Guillermo J., MacNeill, Briain, Takano, Masamichi, Moselewski, Fabian, Iftima, Nicusor, Shishkov, Milen, Houser, Stuart, Aretz, H. Thomas, Halpern, Elkan F., Bouma, Brett E.·2005·Circulation

Abstract

Background— The current understanding of the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease is based largely on postmortem studies. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a high-resolution (≈10 μm), catheter-based imaging modality capable of investigating detailed coronary plaque morphology in vivo. Methods and Results— Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization were enrolled and categorized according to their clinical presentation: recent acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute coronary syndromes (ACS) constituting non-ST-segment elevation AMI and unstable angina, or stable angina pectoris (SAP). OCT imaging was performed with a 3.2F catheter. Two observers independently analyzed the images using the previously validated criteria for plaque characterization. Of 69 patients enrolled, 57 patients (20 with AMI, 20 with ACS, and 17 with SAP) had analyzable images. In the AMI, ACS, and SAP groups, lipid-rich plaque (defined by lipid occupying ≥2 quadrants of the cross-sectional area) was observed in 90%, 75%, and 59%, respectively ( P =0.09). The median value of the minimum thickness of the fibrous cap was 47.0, 53.8, and 102.6 μm, respectively ( P =0.034). The frequency of thin-cap fibroatheroma (defined by lipid-rich plaque with cap thickness ≤65 μm) was 72% in the AMI group, 50% in the ACS group, and 20% in the SAP group ( P =0.012). No procedure-related complications occurred. Conclusions— OCT is a safe and effective modality for characterizing coronary atherosclerotic plaques in vivo. Thin-cap fibroatheroma was more frequently observed in patients with AMI or ACS than SAP. This is the first study to compare detailed in vivo plaque morphology in patients with different clinical presentations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000159354.43778.69

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 896

Metadata

Authors
Jang, I.-K., Tearney, G. J., MacNeill, B., Takano, M., Moselewski, F., Iftima, N., Shishkov, M., Houser, S., Aretz, H. T., Halpern, E. F., & Bouma, B. E.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2005-03-29
Volume
111
Issue
12
Pages
1551-1555
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2147801509
Cited by
896
References
2
FWCI
34.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Characterization of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque by Use of Optical Coherence Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000159354.43778.69
The paper
Jang, I.-K., Tearney, G. J., MacNeill, B., Takano, M., Moselewski, F., Iftima, N., Shishkov, M., Houser, S., Aretz, H. T., Halpern, E. F., & Bouma, B. E. (2005). In Vivo Characterization of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque by Use of Optical Coherence Tomography. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000159354.43778.69

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.