Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of Indirect and Direct Methods of Measuring Arterial Blood Pressure

VAN BERGEN, FREDERICK H., WEATHERHEAD, D. STUART, TRELOAR, ALAN E., DOBKIN, ALLAN B., BUCKLEY, JOSEPH J.·1954·Circulation

Abstract

Direct and indirect determinations of blood pressure have been recorded in 70 human subjects. Statistical analysis of the results is presented. A frequent discrepancy between direct and indirect readings is evident with the drift of the latter falling increasingly below the direct measurement as blood pressure rises. The greatest discrepancy is found in the young hypertensive subject and the possible clinical implications of this finding are discussed. An attempt is made to explain some of the factors contributing to the variable error by which auscultatory readings underestimate the true intraarterial pressure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.10.4.481

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
VAN BERGEN, F. H., WEATHERHEAD, D. S., TRELOAR, A. E., DOBKIN, A. B., & BUCKLEY, J. J.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1954-10
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
481-490
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2079468138
Cited by
195
References
0
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Indirect and Direct Methods of Measuring Arterial Blood Pressure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.10.4.481
The paper
VAN BERGEN, F. H., WEATHERHEAD, D. S., TRELOAR, A. E., DOBKIN, A. B., & BUCKLEY, J. J. (1954). Comparison of Indirect and Direct Methods of Measuring Arterial Blood Pressure. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.10.4.481

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.