Cited by 154Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement according to the relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference in critically ill patients

Bur, Andreas, Hirschl, Michael M., Herkner, Harald, Oschatz, Elisabeth, Kofler, Julia, Woisetschläger, Christian, Laggner, Anton N.·2000·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement according to the relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Prospective data collection. SETTING: Emergency department in a 2,000-bed inner city hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight patients categorized into three groups according to their upper-arm circumference (group I: 18-25 cm; group II: 25.1-33 cm; and group III: 33.1-47.5 cm) were enrolled in the study protocol. INTERVENTIONS: In each patient, all three cuff sizes (Hewlett-Packard Cuff 40401 B, C, and D) were used to perform an oscillometric blood pressure measurement at least within 3 mins until ten to 20 measurements for each cuff size were achieved. Invasive mean arterial blood pressure measurement was done by cannulation of the contralateral radial artery with direct transduction of the systemic arterial pressure waveform. The corresponding invasive blood pressure value was obtained at the end of each oscillometric measurement. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 1,494 pairs of simultaneous oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measurements were collected in 38 patients (group I, n = 5; group II, n = 23; and group III, n = 10) over a total time of 72.3 hrs. Mean arterial blood pressure ranged from 35 to 165 mm Hg. The overall discrepancy between oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measurement was -6.7+/-9.7 mm Hg (p<.0001), if the recommended cuff size according to the upper-arm circumference was used (539 measurements). Of all the blood pressure measurements, 26.4% (n = 395) had a discrepancy of > or =10 mm Hg and 34.2% (n = 512) exhibited a discrepancy of > or =20 mm Hg. No differences between invasive and noninvasive blood pressure measurements were noted in patients either with or without inotropic support (-6.6 + 7.2 vs. -8.6 + 6.8 mm Hg; not significant). CONCLUSION: The oscillometric blood pressure measurement significantly underestimates arterial blood pressure and exhibits a high number of measurements out of the clinically acceptable range. The relation between cuff size and upper-arm circumference contributes substantially to the inaccuracy of the oscillometric blood pressure measurement. Therefore, oscillometric blood pressure measurement does not achieve adequate accuracy in critically ill patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00014

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bur, A., Hirschl, M. M., Herkner, H., Oschatz, E., Kofler, J., Woisetschläger, C., & Laggner, A. N.
Affiliations
Vienna General Hospital (AT)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2000-02
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
371-376
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968250575
Cited by
154
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
oscillometric blood pressure measurement, cuff size, upper arm circumference, measurement accuracy, critically ill patients, invasive blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, inotropic support, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, emergency department patients, radial artery cannulation, hemodynamic monitoring, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anthropometry, Arm, Blood Pressure Determination, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Oscillometry, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Bias, Linear Models, Critical Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review