The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Association Between Local Pulse Pressure, Mean Blood Pressure, and Large-Artery Remodeling
Abstract
Background —The aim of the present study was to determine the respective influences of local pulse pressure and mean blood pressure on arterial remodeling in humans at 2 arterial sites: a central, predominantly elastic artery (the common carotid artery) and a peripheral muscular artery (the radial artery). Methods and Results —Forty-three healthy subjects and 124 never-treated hypertensive patients were included in the study. Intima-media thickness and internal diameter of the carotid and radial arteries were noninvasively determined with high-definition echo-tracking devices. Pulse pressure was measured locally with applanation tonometry. Multivariate regression models including mean blood pressure and local pulse pressure were established in the whole population. Carotid internal diameter and intima-media thickness were strongly influenced ( P <0.0001) by carotid pulse pressure but not by mean blood pressure or brachial pulse pressure, independently of age and sex. Radial artery internal diameter was correlated with age but not with mean blood pressure or radial pulse pressure. Radial artery intima-media thickness was correlated with mean blood pressure ( P <0.001) but not with radial pulse pressure. Conclusions —Carotid pulse pressure was a strong independent determinant of carotid artery enlargement and wall thickening, whereas mean blood pressure and brachial pulse pressure were not, indicating the prominent influence of local pulsatile mechanical load on arterial remodeling. These relationships were observed at the site of an elastic artery but not at the site of a muscular artery, suggesting the contribution of cyclic stretching to the pulse pressure–induced arterial remodeling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laurent, S., Boutouyrie, P., Asmar, R., Gautier, I., Laloux, B., Guize, L., Ducimetiere, P., & Benetos, A. (2001) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.37.5.1236 · Cited by 3,856
Self-citationRoman, M. J., Devereux, R. B., Kizer, J. R., Lee, E. T., Galloway, J. M., Ali, T., Umans, J. G., & Howard, B. V. (2007) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.107.089078 · Cited by 1,080
Pulse pressure—a review of mechanisms and clinical relevance
Dart, A. M., & Kingwell, B. A. (2001) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01108-1 · Cited by 836
Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Arterial Stiffening: Relevance in Development, Aging, and Disease
Lacolley, P., Regnault, V., Segers, P., & Laurent, S. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00003.2017 · Cited by 734
Self-citationCentral blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance
McEniery, C. M., Cockcroft, J. R., Roman, M. J., Franklin, S. S., & Wilkinson, I. B. (2014) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht565 · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Authors
- Boutouyrie, P., Bussy, C., Lacolley, P., Girerd, X., Laloux, B., & Laurent, S.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1999-09-28
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1387-1393
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2108249447
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association Between Local Pulse Pressure, Mean Blood Pressure, and Large-Artery Remodeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.100.13.1387
- The paper
- Boutouyrie, P., Bussy, C., Lacolley, P., Girerd, X., Laloux, B., & Laurent, S. (1999). Association Between Local Pulse Pressure, Mean Blood Pressure, and Large-Artery Remodeling. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.100.13.1387
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.