Cited by 46Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionSodium Intake and Health

Identification of Risk Factors in Hypertensive Patients: Contribution of Randomized Controlled Trials Through an Individual Patient Database

Open access
Gueyffier, François, Boissel, Jean-Pierre, Pocock, Stuart, Boutitie, Florent, Coope, John, Cutler, Jeffrey, Ekbom, Tord, Fagard, Robert +5 more·1999·Circulation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predicting individual risk is needed to target preventive interventions toward people with the highest probability of benefit over a given time period. We assessed which prognostic factors should be used in predicting risk for hypertensive patients and in searching for treatment modifiers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 24 390 hypertensive participants who constituted the control groups from 8 controlled trials (1726 deaths over 5 years) were analyzed in multivariate survival models. Outcomes were coronary heart disease death, stroke death, and cardiovascular death. We explored systematically the heterogeneity of results between trials. Left ventricular hypertrophy was electrocardiographically confirmed to be a powerful risk factor and should be included in risk scoring. Height, glomerular filtration rate, and serum uric acid deserve further exploration. Body mass index and heart rate were not confirmed as independent cardiovascular risk factors in this population. The association between male sex and coronary heart disease death was significantly stronger in British cohorts. The lack of prognostic value of diastolic blood pressure was explained by an interaction with age, with a positive association before 65 years and a negative association thereafter. Previous antihypertensive treatment was a significant risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trials provide valuable information for risk prediction. Carefully exploring the heterogeneity among trials is a way to assess the generalizability of findings. This approach, if systematically performed, should increase the ability to identify risk modifiers and to predict individual therapeutic benefit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.100.18.e88

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with hypertension, the occurrence of LVH has been associated with an increase in mortality from all cardiovascular causes.

    “In patients with hypertension, the occurrence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) has been associated with an increase in mortality from all cardiovascular causes (1–4).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jackson R, Barham P, Bills T, Birch T, McLennan L, MacMahon S, Maling T. The management of raised blood pressure in New Zealand. Br Med J. 1993;307:107-110.
  2. Cornu C, on behalf of the TAS-PP Group. Thrombolysis in acute stroke pooling project (TAS-PP): a prospective pooled individual patient database. Control Clin Trials. 1994;15:99S. Abstract.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gueyffier, F., Boissel, J.-P., Pocock, S., Boutitie, F., Coope, J., Cutler, J., Ekbom, T., Fagard, R., Friedman, L., Kerlikowske, K., Perry, M., Prineas, R., & Schron, E.
Affiliations
  • From the Clinical Pharmacology Department (F.G., J.-P.B., F.B.), Claude Bernard University, Lyon Hospitals, Lyon, France; the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (J.C., L.F., E.S.), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md; the Department of Community Health Sciences (T.E.), Dalby/Lund, Sweden; Veterans Administration Medical Center (K.K.), San Francisco, Calif; the Hypertension and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit (R.F.), Leuven, Belgium; Washington University School of Medicine (M.P.),...
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
Venue
Circulation
Published
1999-11-02
Volume
100
Issue
18
Pages
e88-94
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1967388369
Cited by
46
References
34
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
hypertension, cardiovascular risk factors, risk prediction, left ventricular hypertrophy, coronary heart disease mortality, stroke mortality, cardiovascular mortality, trial heterogeneity, antihypertensive therapy, diastolic blood pressure, sex differences, glomerular filtration rate, serum uric acid, body mass index, heart rate, risk scoring
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Odds Ratio, Survival Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review