The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PREDICT: A Simple Risk Score for Clinical Severity and Long-Term Prognosis After Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction or Unstable Angina: The Minnesota Heart Survey
Open accessAbstract
Background —We evaluated short- and long-term mortality risks in 30- to 74-year-old patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina and developed a new score called PREDICT. Methods and Results —PREDICT was based on information routinely collected in hospital. Predictors abstracted from hospital record items pertaining to the admission day, including shock, heart failure, ECG findings, cardiovascular disease history, kidney function, and age. Comorbidity was assessed from discharge diagnoses, and mortality was determined from death certificates. For 1985 and 1990 hospitalizations, the 6-year death rate in 6134 patients with 0 to 1 score points was 4%, increasing stepwise to 89% for ≥16 points. Score validity was established by only slightly attenuated mortality prediction in 3570 admissions in 1970 and 1980. When case severity was controlled for, 6-year risk declined 32% between 1970 and 1990. When PREDICT was held constant, 24% of those treated with thrombolysis died in 6 years compared with 31% of those not treated. Conclusions —The simple PREDICT risk score was a powerful prognosticator of 6-year mortality after hospitalization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases
DEYO, R. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8 · Cited by 10,452
Cited by
Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Hong, Y., Labarthe, D., Mozaffarian, D., Appel, L. J., Van Horn, L., Greenlund, K., Daniels, S., Nichol, G., Tomaselli, G. F., et al. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.192703 · Cited by 4,750
Bootstrap Methods for Developing Predictive Models
Austin, P. C., & Tu, J. V. (2004) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/0003130043277 · Cited by 622
De Luca, G., Suryapranata, H., van’t Hof, A. W. J., de Boer, M.-J., Hoorntje, J. C. A., Dambrink, J.-H. E., Gosselink, A. T. M., Ottervanger, J. P., & Zijlstra, F. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000131765.73959.87 · Cited by 293
Smoking Status and Risk for Recurrent Coronary Events after Myocardial Infarction
Rea, T. D., Heckbert, S. R., Kaplan, R. C., Smith, N. L., Lemaitre, R. N., & Psaty, B. M. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-6-200209170-00009 · Cited by 213
Albuminuria as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Mok, Y., Ballew, S. H., Sang, Y., Grams, M. E., Coresh, J., Evans, M., Barany, P., Ärnlöv, J., Carrero, J., & Matsushita, K. (2019) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.118.010546 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobs, D. R., Kroenke, C., Crow, R., Deshpande, M., Gu, D. F., Gatewood, L., & Blackburn, H.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1999-08-10
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 599-607
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1983816893
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PREDICT: A Simple Risk Score for Clinical Severity and Long-Term Prognosis After Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction or Unstable Angina: The Minnesota Heart Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.100.6.599
- The paper
- Jacobs, D. R., Kroenke, C., Crow, R., Deshpande, M., Gu, D. F., Gatewood, L., & Blackburn, H. (1999). PREDICT: A Simple Risk Score for Clinical Severity and Long-Term Prognosis After Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction or Unstable Angina: The Minnesota Heart Survey. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.100.6.599
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
