Cited by 622Statistical Methods and InferenceStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyStatistical Methods and Applications

Bootstrap Methods for Developing Predictive Models

Austin, Peter C, Tu, Jack V·2004·The American Statistician

Abstract

Researchers frequently use automated model selection methods such as backwards elimination to identify variables that are independent predictors of an outcome under consideration. We propose using bootstrap resampling in conjunction with automated variable selection methods to develop parsimonious prediction models. Using data on patients admitted to hospital with a heart attack, we demonstrate that selecting those variables that were identified as independent predictors of mortality in at least 60%% of the bootstrap samples resulted in a parsimonious model with excellent predictive ability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1198/0003130043277

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The multi-model ensemble mean increase in Niño3.4 SST variability under SSP585 is 16.1% and statistically significant according to a Bootstrap method.

    “The multi-model ensemble mean increase (16.1%) is statistically significant according to a Bootstrap method 18 (see 'Bootstrap test' in Methods and Extended Data Fig. 1).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Austin, P. C., & Tu, J. V.
Affiliations
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Venue
The American Statistician
Published
2004-05
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
131-137
ISSN
  • 0003-1305 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2731
OpenAlex
W1978954330
Cited by
622
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 31
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The American Statistician (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
bootstrapping, backward elimination, predictive modeling, parsimonious models, heart attack mortality, hospitalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review