Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Process of Progression of Coronary Artery Lesions From Mild or Moderate Stenosis to Moderate or Severe Stenosis: A Study Based on Four Serial Coronary Arteriograms per Year

Open access
Yokoya, Koichi, Takatsu, Hisato, Suzuki, Takahiko, Hosokawa, Hiroaki, Ojio, Shinsuke, Matsubara, Tetsuo, Tanaka, Tsutomu, Watanabe, Sachiro, Morita, Norihiko, Nishigaki, Kazuhiko, Takemura, Genzou, Noda, Toshiyuki, Minatoguchi, Shinya, Fujiwara, Hisayoshi·1999·Circulation

Abstract

Background —The process of progression in coronary artery disease is unknown. Methods and Results —The subjects were 36 patients with 36 objective vessels with clinically significant progression of coronary artery disease (≥15% per year) in whom 4 serial coronary arteriograms (CAGs) were performed at intervals of ≈4 months in a 1-year period. The degree of progression of percent stenosis between each of 2 serial CAGs was classified as marked (M: ≥15%), slight (S: 5% to 14%), and no progression (N: <5%). From the pattern of progression, the 36 vessels were classified as 14 type 1 vessels with marked progression (N→N→M in 13 vessels and S→S→M in 1 vessel) and 22 type 2 vessels without marked progression (S→S→S in 18 vessels, N→S→S in 4). Percent stenosis at the first, second, third, and final CAGs was 44±14%, 46±13%, 46±13%, and 88±10% ( P <0.05 versus first CAG) in type 1 vessels and 44±11%, 50±9%, 59±9%, and 67±9% in type 2 vessels ( P <0.05 for second, third, and final CAGs versus first CAG). Type 1 vessels featured the sudden appearance of severe stenosis due to marked progression, angina pectoris, or myocardial infarction (71%) and Ambrose type II eccentric lesions indicating plaque rupture or thrombi (57%). Type 2 vessels featured continuous slight progression of stenosis with smooth vessel walls; angina pectoris (14%) occurred when the percent stenosis reached a severe level. An increase in serum C-reactive protein was observed only in the type 2 vessel group, which suggests a relation between continuous slight progression and inflammatory change. Conclusions —Two types of stenosis progression provide a new insight into the mechanism of coronary artery disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.100.9.903

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Yokoya, K., Takatsu, H., Suzuki, T., Hosokawa, H., Ojio, S., Matsubara, T., Tanaka, T., Watanabe, S., Morita, N., Nishigaki, K., Takemura, G., Noda, T., Minatoguchi, S., & Fujiwara, H.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1999-08-31
Volume
100
Issue
9
Pages
903-909
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2152409347
Cited by
160
References
0
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Process of Progression of Coronary Artery Lesions From Mild or Moderate Stenosis to Moderate or Severe Stenosis: A Study Based on Four Serial Coronary Arteriograms per Year. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.100.9.903
The paper
Yokoya, K., Takatsu, H., Suzuki, T., Hosokawa, H., Ojio, S., Matsubara, T., Tanaka, T., Watanabe, S., Morita, N., Nishigaki, K., Takemura, G., Noda, T., Minatoguchi, S., & Fujiwara, H. (1999). Process of Progression of Coronary Artery Lesions From Mild or Moderate Stenosis to Moderate or Severe Stenosis: A Study Based on Four Serial Coronary Arteriograms per Year. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.100.9.903

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.