The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Noninvasive Detection of Myocardial Ischemia From Perfusion Reserve Based on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Open accessAbstract
Background —Myocardial perfusion reserve can be noninvasively assessed with cardiovascular MR. In this study, the diagnostic accuracy of this technique for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis was evaluated. Methods and Results —In 15 patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease and 5 patients without significant coronary artery disease, the signal intensity–time curves of the first pass of a gadolinium-DTPA bolus injected through a central vein catheter were evaluated before and after dipyridamole infusion to validate the technique. A linear fit was used to determine the upslope, and a cutoff value for the differentiation between the myocardium supplied by stenotic and nonstenotic coronary arteries was defined. The diagnostic accuracy was then examined prospectively in 34 patients with coronary artery disease and was compared with coronary angiography. A significant difference in myocardial perfusion reserve between ischemic and normal myocardial segments (1.08±0.23 and 2.33±0.41; P <0.001) was found that resulted in a cutoff value of 1.5 (mean minus 2 SD of normal segments). In the prospective analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of coronary artery stenosis (≥75%) were 90%, 83%, and 87%, respectively. Interobserver and intraobserver variabilities for the linear fit were low ( r =0.96 and 0.99). Conclusions —MR first-pass perfusion measurements yielded a high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of coronary artery disease. Myocardial perfusion reserve can be easily and reproducibly determined by a linear fit of the upslope of the signal intensity–time curves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis
Gould, K. L., Lipscomb, K., & Hamilton, G. W. (1974) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0002-9149(74)90743-7 · Cited by 1,532
Relation between Myocardial Blood Flow and the Severity of Coronary-Artery Stenosis
Uren, N. G., Melin, J. A., De Bruyne, B., Wijns, W., Baudhuin, T., & Camici, P. G. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199406233302503 · Cited by 881
Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity
Gould, K. L., Kirkeeide, R. L., & Buchi, M. (1990) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80078-6 · Cited by 548
Influence of age and hemodynamics on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve.
Czernin, J., Müller, P., Chan, S., Brunken, R. C., Porenta, G., Krivokapich, J., Chen, K., Chan, A., Phelps, M. E., & Schelbert, H. R. (1993) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.88.1.62 · Cited by 498
Bergmann, S. R., Herrero, P., Markham, J., Weinheimer, C. J., & Walsh, M. N. (1989) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(89)90105-8 · Cited by 439
First-pass cardiac perfusion: evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging.
Atkinson, D. J., Burstein, D., & Edelman, R. R. (1990) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.174.3.2305058 · Cited by 359
Demer, L. L., Gould, K. L., Goldstein, R. A., Kirkeeide, R. L., Mullani, N. A., Smalling, R. W., Nishikawa, A., & Merhige, M. E. (1989) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.79.4.825 · Cited by 316
Manning, W. J., Atkinson, D. J., Grossman, W., Paulin, S., & Edelman, R. R. (1991) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(91)90754-w · Cited by 305
Go, R. T., Marwick, T. H., MacIntyre, W. J., Saha, G. B., Neumann, D. R., Underwood, D. A., & Simpfendorfer, C. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 284
Cited by
Greenwood, J. P., Maredia, N., Younger, J. F., Brown, J. M., Nixon, J., Everett, C. C., Bijsterveld, P., Ridgway, J. P., Radjenovic, A., Dickinson, C. J., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61335-4 · Cited by 1,114
Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report?
PENNELL, D. (2004) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.040 · Cited by 747
ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Hundley, W. G., Bluemke, D. A., Finn, J. P., Flamm, S. D., Fogel, M. A., Friedrich, M. G., Ho, V. B., Jerosch-Herold, M., Kramer, C. M., Manning, W. J., et al. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.011 · Cited by 593
Coronary microvascular dysfunction: mechanisms and functional assessment
Camici, P. G., d'Amati, G., & Rimoldi, O. (2015) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2014.160 · Cited by 498
Noninvasive coronary angiography—an acceptable alternative?
Achenbach, S., & Daniel, W. G. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200112273452609 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-Saadi, N., Nagel, E., Gross, M., Bornstedt, A., Schnackenburg, B., Klein, C., Klimek, W., Oswald, H., & Fleck, E.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-03-28
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1379-1383
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2103476848
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 25.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive Detection of Myocardial Ischemia From Perfusion Reserve Based on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1379
- The paper
- Al-Saadi, N., Nagel, E., Gross, M., Bornstedt, A., Schnackenburg, B., Klein, C., Klimek, W., Oswald, H., & Fleck, E. (2000). Noninvasive Detection of Myocardial Ischemia From Perfusion Reserve Based on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
