Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Model for Preoperative Risk Stratification

Open access
Zaman, Azfar G., Archbold, R. Andrew, Helft, Gérard, Paul, Elizabeth A., Curzen, Nicholas P., Mills, Peter G.·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background —Atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs in 20% to 40% of patients after CABG. Identification of patients vulnerable for arrhythmia will allow targeting of those most likely to benefit from prophylactic therapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate accuracy of a prospectively defined signal-averaged P-wave duration (SAPD) cutoff and additional preoperative characteristics for the prediction of AF after CABG. Methods and Results —Patients undergoing elective isolated CABG were recruited to the present prospective study. SAPD was recorded in all patients. Filtered signals from 3 orthogonal leads were combined in a vector analysis, and total SAPD was measured preoperatively. Postoperative in-hospital AF occurred in 92 (28.2%) of 326 patients. Patients who developed AF were older (65.9 versus 61.7 years of age; P <0.0005) and had longer SAPD (158 versus 145 ms; P <0.0005) than non-AF patients. Incidence of AF increased in patients ≥75 years of age and increased progressively throughout the range of SAPD. Stepwise logistic regression analysis of preoperative variables identified that SAPD >155 ms (odds ratio, 5.37; 95% CI, 3.10 to 9.30; P <0.0005), advanced age (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.86 per 5-year increase in age; P <0.0005), and male sex (odds ratio, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.30 to 6.40; P <0.01) independently predicted AF. Prospectively defined SAPD >155 ms predicted AF with positive and negative predictive accuracy of 49% and 84%, respectively. Conclusions —A combination of prolonged SAPD, advanced age, and male sex identifies patients at high risk for development of AF after CABG.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1403

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Zaman, A. G., Archbold, R. A., Helft, G., Paul, E. A., Curzen, N. P., & Mills, P. G.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-03-28
Volume
101
Issue
12
Pages
1403-1408
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1974271755
Cited by
314
References
32
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Model for Preoperative Risk Stratification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1403
The paper
Zaman, A. G., Archbold, R. A., Helft, G., Paul, E. A., Curzen, N. P., & Mills, P. G. (2000). Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Model for Preoperative Risk Stratification. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1403

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.