The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Transvalvular Gradient and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Result of Aortic Valve Replacement in 52 Patients
Abstract
Background—The outcome of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis, low transvalvular gradient, and severe left ventricular dysfunction is not well known. Methods and Results—Between 1985 and 1995, 52 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) ≤35% and aortic stenosis with transvalvular mean gradient <30 mm Hg underwent aortic valve replacement. The mean (±SD) preoperative characteristics included EF, 26±8%; aortic valve mean gradient, 23±4 mm Hg; aortic valve area, 0.7±0.2 cm 2; and cardiac output, 3.7±1.2 L/min. Simultaneous coronary artery bypass graft surgery was performed in 32 patients (62%). Perioperative (30-day) mortality was 21% (11 of 52 patients). Ten additional patients died during follow-up. Advanced age (P=0.048) and small aortic prosthesis size (P=0.03) were significant predictors of hospital mortality by univariate analysis. By multivariate analysis, the only predictor of surgical mortality was smaller prosthesis size. The only predictor of postoperative survival was improvement in postoperative functional class (P=0.04). Postoperative functional improvement occurred in most patients. Postoperative EF was assessed in 93% of survivors; 74% demonstrated improvement. Positive change in EF was related to smaller preoperative aortic valve area and female sex. Conclusions—Despite severe left ventricular dysfunction, low transvalvular mean gradient, and increased operative mortality, aortic valve replacement was associated with improved functional status. Postoperative survival was related to younger patient age and larger aortic prosthesis size, and medium-term survival was related to improved postoperative functional class.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Failed Bioprosthetic Surgical Valves
Dvir, D., Webb, J. G., Bleiziffer, S., Pasic, M., Waksman, R., Kodali, S., Barbanti, M., Latib, A., Schaefer, U., Rodés-Cabau, J., et al. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.7246 · Cited by 923
Carabello, B. A., & Paulus, W. J. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60211-7 · Cited by 818
Monin, J.-L., Quéré, J.-P., Monchi, M., Petit, H., Baleynaud, S., Chauvel, C., Pop, C., Ohlmann, P., Lelguen, C., Dehant, P., et al. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000079171.43055.46 · Cited by 601
Tribouilloy, C., Lévy, F., Rusinaru, D., Guéret, P., Petit-Eisenmann, H., Baleynaud, S., Jobic, Y., Adams, C., Lelong, B., Pasquet, A., et al. (2009) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.026 · Cited by 366
Time-dependent bias was common in survival analyses published in leading clinical journals
van Walraven, C., Davis, D., Forster, A. J., & Wells, G. A. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.008 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Connolly, H. M., Oh, J. K., Schaff, H. V., Roger, V. L., Osborn, S. L., Hodge, D. O., & Tajik, A. J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2000-04-25
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1940-1946
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2066832250
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Transvalvular Gradient and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Result of Aortic Valve Replacement in 52 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.101.16.1940
- The paper
- Connolly, H. M., Oh, J. K., Schaff, H. V., Roger, V. L., Osborn, S. L., Hodge, D. O., & Tajik, A. J. (2000). Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Transvalvular Gradient and Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Result of Aortic Valve Replacement in 52 Patients. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.16.1940
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.